000			01804cam a2200301 4500
001			820431
003			PUCPR
005			20240502152355.0
008			711005s1971 nyu b 000 0 eng
010			_a 76168745
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC _dBET _bspa _erda
049			_aBET
050	0	0	_aBV 601.6.I5 _bI525
082	0	0	_a262.7/2
245	0	4	_aThe Infallibility debate / _cGregory Baum, George Lindbeck, Richard McBrien, Harry J. McSorley, edited by John J. Kirvan.
260			_aNew York : _bPaulist Press, _c©1971.
300			_avi, 154 pages ; _c21 cm.
336			_2rdacontent _btxt _atext
337			_2rdamedia _bn _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _bnc _avolume
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505			_aWhen is a theological debate more than a churchy quarrel? More than esoteric book reviewing? When the debate digs into underlying questions that involve the whole of man's search for the meaning of human life it becomes important. When, as in the case of the infallibility debate, it stretches the perimeters of the discussion to examine the possibility of truth and the shape of its possible expression, then it is important. When the debaters go beyond "point making" to make their own contributions to a conversation that is just beginning then it is important. When the contributors are contributors are among the most insightful and provocative of today's theologians, then the debate is worth its time and space.Gregory Baum, Richard McBrien, Harry McSorley and George Lindbeck attempt in this book to do all these things, to make it important.
610	2	0	_aCatholic Church _xInfallibility.
700	1		_aBaum, Gregory, _d1923-
700	1		_aKirvan, John J., _eed.
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d2 _encip _f19 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _c31
999			_c302304 _d302304