000			02536nam a22003251 4500
001			754806
003			PUCPR
005			20230801151323.0
008			740410s1967 ilu b 000 0beng
010			_a 67012355
040			_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC _bspa _erda
049			_aBET
050	0	0	_aB 2798 _b.G68
082	0	0	_a193
090			_aB 2798 .G68
100	1		_aGram, Moltke S.,
245	1	0	_aKant: _bDisputed Questions / _cedited, with an introd. and new translations, by Moltke S. Gram.
260			_aChicago, _bQuadrangle Books, _c1967.
264			_3©
300			_a313 pages ; _c22 cm.
336			_2rdacontent _btxt _atext
337			_2rdamedia _bn _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _bnc _avolume
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references.
505			_aThe Patchwork Thesis -- The Trascendental Deduction of the Categories in the First Edition of the Critique of Pure reason : Hans Vaihinger -- Is the Trascendental Deduction a Patchwork? H. J. Paton -- Kant and The Problem of Metaphysics -- Kant's Antithesis of Dogmatism and Criticism: Arthur O. Lovejoy -- Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics: Ernst Cassirer Metaphysical Motives in the Development of Critical Idealism: Heinz Heimsoeth -- Kant's Theory of The Synthetic - Analytic Distinction -- Kant's Theory of Definition: Lewis White Beck -- Can Kant's Deduction of the Categories: H. J. Paton -- Kant's Classification of the Forms of Judgment: Arthur O. Lovejoy -- On kant's Reply to Hume: Arthur O. Lovejoy
520			_aThe core essays with critical commentary by the editor illuminate the tree crucial problems in Kant's philosophy, still open argument in our time. in the first section of the book, the contributors ask whether kant's argument in the Trascendental Deduction of the categories is the unified and cogent piece of reasoning kant took it to be. The papers in the second section ask about the relation between the Trascendental Method as Kant understood it and the viability of traditional metaphysics. Here the issue is whether Kant's own position is metaphysically neutral, as he claims it to be, or whether Kant himself presupposes a hidden metaphysics. Finally, the third section analytic judgments, asking primarily whether Kant succeeded in giving us a workable criterion for applying that distinction, and whether he succeeded in showing that the are judgments that are both synthetic and a priori.
600	1	0	_aKant, Immanuel, _d1724-1804.
906			_a7 _bcbc _corignew _du _eocip _f19 _gy-gencatlg
942			_2lcc _c31
999			_c300547 _d300547