000 02979cam a22003977a 4500
001 16723467
003 PUCPR
005 20230320154251.0
008 110406s2011 orua bm 001 0 eng d
010 _a 2011281241
020 _a1608994597
020 _a9781608994595
035 _a(OCoLC)ocn703218679
040 _aYDXCP
_cYDXCP
_dDTM
_dDLC
_bspa
_erda
042 _alccopycat
049 _aBET
082 _2BS 2595.52
_a.M374 2011
090 _aBS 2595.52 .M374 2011
100 1 _aMartinez, Roberto.
245 1 0 _aQuestion of John the Baptist and Jesus' indictment of the religious leaders :
_ba critical analysis of Luke 7:18-35 /
_cRoberto Martínez.
260 _aEugene, Or. :
_bCascade Books,
_c©2011.
300 _axiii, 231 pages :
_bill. ;
_c23 cm.
336 _2rdacontent
_btxt
337 _2rdamedia
_bn
338 _2rdacarrier
_bnc
500 _aRevised version of the author's thesis (Ph.D.)--Catholic University of America, 2010.
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 197-206) and indexes.
505 0 _aLuke 7:18-35 : a historical survey -- The origin, redaction and literary function of Luke 7:18-35 -- A narrative-critical interpretation of 7:18-28 -- A narrative-critical interpretation of 7:29-35 -- Conclusion: A narrative-critical interpretation of Luke 7:18-35.
520 _aSince the time of Jerome, scholars have tried to explain why John the Baptist asks Jesus if he is "the one who is to come" (Matt 11:2—6; Luke 7:18—23) after he had apparently identified him as "the lamb of God" (John 1:29—34). The puzzling question is part of one of the longest fragments of traditional material in the New Testament dealing with the Baptist and Jesus. The present study critically examines the Lukan version of this double tradition normally attributed to Q, which includes John's question as well as Jesus testimony about the Baptist (7:24—28) and his reproach of the religious leaders (7:29—35). Martínez investigates the narrative elements of the passage and shows how Luke 7:18—35 is part of a literary pattern within a section whose main goal is to clarify the identity of Jesus. The study argues that the tradition in Matthew 11:2—19 and Luke 7:18—35 deserves to be interpreted differently in the Gospel of Luke and explains how Luke integrantes John's apparent ignorance of Jesus as well as Jesus indictment of the religious leaders into his his literary scheme. Finally, Martínez shows how Luke puts this tradition about John and Jesus at the service of his theocentric and christological perspectives and offers an alternative explanation to the prevailing interpretation of Joh's question.
600 0 0 _aJesus Christ
_xConflicts.
600 0 0 _aJohn,
_cthe Baptist, Saint.
630 0 0 _aBible.
_pLuke, VII, 18-35
_xCriticism, Narrative.
906 _a7
_bcbc
_ccopycat
_d2
_encip
_f20
_gy-gencatlg
942 _2lcc
_c31
999 _c299771
_d299771