| 000 | 03107ctm a22005178i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 22475432 | ||
| 003 | pucpr | ||
| 005 | 20230112164138.0 | ||
| 006 | t|||||r|||| 001 0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 220322s2022 enk b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a 2022004450 | ||
| 020 |
_a9781350288447 _q(hardback) |
||
| 020 |
_a9781350288485 _q(paperback) |
||
| 020 |
_z9781350288454 _q(pdf) |
||
| 020 |
_z9781350288461 _q(epub) |
||
| 040 |
_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 042 | _apcc | ||
| 049 | _aBEV | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBJ45.5 _b.B57 2022 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a170 _223 |
| 092 |
_223 _a170 |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aBishop, Jeffrey Paul, | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aBiopolitics after neuroscience : _bmorality and the economy of virtue / _cJeffrey P. Bishop, M. Therese Lysaught and Andrew A. Michel. |
| 263 | _a2206 | ||
| 264 | 1 |
_aLondon ; _aNew York : _bBloomsbury Academic, _c2022. |
|
| 300 | _a288 pages | ||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_aunmediated _bn _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_avolume _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 520 | _a"This book offers a provocative analysis of the neuroscience of morality. Written by three leading scholars of science, medicine, and bioethics, it critiques contemporary neuroscientific claims about individual morality and notions of good and evil. Winner of a 2021 prize from the Expanded Reason Institute, it connects moral philosophy to neoliberal economics and successfully challenges the idea that we can locate morality in the brain. Instead of discovering the source of morality in the brain as they claim to do, the popularizers of contemporary neuroscience are shown to participate in an understanding of human behavior that serves the vested interests of contemporary political economy. Providing evidence that the history of claims about morality and brain function reach back 400 years, the authors locate its genesis in the beginnings of modern philosophy, science, and economics. They further map this trajectory through the economic and moral theories of Francis Bacon, David Hume, Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill, and the Chicago School of Economics to uncover a pervasive colonial anthropology at play in the neuroscience of morality today. The book concludes with a call for a humbler and more constrained neuroscience, informed by a more robust human anthropology that embraces the nobility, beauty, frailties, and flaws in being human"-- | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aEthics. | |
| 650 | 0 |
_aCognitive neuroscience _xMoral and ethical aspects. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aCognitive science _xMoral and ethical aspects. |
|
| 650 | 0 | _aNeurosciences. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aNeoliberalism. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aBiopolitics. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aLysaught, M. Therese, | |
| 700 | 1 | _aMichel, Andrew A., | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iOnline version: _aBishop, Jeffrey P. _tBiopolitics after neuroscience _dLondon ; New York : Bloomsbury Academic, 2022 _z9781350288454 _w(DLC) 2022004451 |
| 906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
| 942 |
_2ddc _c6 _e23 _h170 |
||
| 999 |
_c299288 _d299288 |
||