000			02659nam a22003257a 4500
003			pucpr
005			20220308141857.0
008			190501s2019 nyuao b 001 0 eng
020			_a9781941332467 _q(pbk. : alk. paper)
020			_a1941332463
040			_apucpr _beng _cpucpr _dpucpr _erda
049			_aCARIBET
050	0	0	_aNA2500 _bM377 2019
082	0	0	_223 _a720.1
100	1		_aMay, John _c(Architect),
245	1	0	_aSignal. image. architecture. : _beverything is already an image. / _cJohn May. _htxt
264		1	_aNew York : _bColumbia Books on Architecture and the City , _c2019.
300			_a143 p. : _bill.; photo. ; _c19 cm. _fbook
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505	0		_amyelectriceye -- Three axioms x three storage formats -- What orthography was -- Real time : the state of management -- The automatic present (or, The politics of very large numbers) -- Telemasis. --
520			_a"Architecture is immersed in an immense cultural experiment called imaging. ​Yet the technical status and nature of that imaging must be reevaluated. What happens to the architectural mind when it stops pretending that electronic images of drawings made by computers are drawings? When it finally admits that imaging is not drawing, but is instead something that has already obliterated drawing? These are questions that, in general, architecture has scarcely begun to pose​, ​imagining that somehow its ideas and practices can resist the culture of imaging in which ​the rest of life now either swims or drowns. To patiently describe the world to oneself is to prepare the ground for an as yet unavailable politics. New descriptions can, under the right circumstances, be made to serve as the raw substrate for political impulses that cannot yet be expressed or lived, because their preconditions have not been arranged and articulated. Signal. Image. Architecture.​ aims to clarify the status of computational images in contemporary architectural thought and practice by showing what happens if the technical basis of architecture is examined very closely, if its technical terms and concepts are taken very seriously, at times even literally. It is not a theory of architectural images, but rather a brief philosophical description of architecture after imaging." --
650		0	_aArchitecture _xPhilosophy.
650		0	_aImage (Philosophy)
650		0	_aArchitecture and technology.
650		0	_aDigital images.
942			_2lcc _c6 _hNA2500 _kGeneral _mM377 2019
999			_c297926 _d297926