000			08816nam a22003257a 4500
999			_c256627 _d256627
003			pucpr
005			20200225170003.0
008			170120b2016 xxuabe|| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020			_a9789461867094
022			_a22123202
040			_apucpr _beng _cpucpr _dpucpr _erda
049			_aCARIBET
050			_aNA6602.T4 _bM34 2016
100			_9294091 _aFlavia Curvelo Magdaniel _qFlavia Curvelo Magdaniel
245			_aTechnology campuses and cities : _ba study on the relation between innovation and the built ... environment at the urban area level _cMagdaniel, Flavia Curvelo _htxt
264			_aColombia : _bDeft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture , _c2016
300			_a476 pages: _billustrations: _fboook _c30 cm
336			_2rdacontent _atext _btxt
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediaded _bn
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume _bnc
500			_aIncludes index.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references
520			_aContents : Summary PART I Background 1 Introduction 1.1 Research field 1.2 Problem definition 1.2.1 Problem statement 1.2.2. Knowledge basis : gaps and opportunities 1.3 Research aim and questions 1.3.2 Exploratory questions 1.3.2 Explanatory-descriptive questions 1.4 Research design 1.4.1 Research approach 1.4.2 Strategies and methods 1.4.3 Assumptions 1.5 Research outline 1.5.1 Dissertation structure 1.5.2 Readers' guide 1.5.3 Definitions PART II Exploratory research 2 Applied concepts and theories 2.1 Introduction 2.1.1 Chapter aim and questions 2.1.2 Methods 2.2 The role of the built environment in stimulating innovation 2.2.1 Real estate as an organisational resource 2.2.2 The added value of real estate on organisational performance 2.2.3 Stimulating innovation : organisational goal, real estate strategy, and added value 2.3 Stimulating innovation in the knowledge economy 2.3.1 Cities and the built environment in the knowledge economy 2.3.2 Direction of further exploratory research in the literature 2.4 Innovation , economy and geography 2.4.1 The economics of innovation 2.4.2 The geography of innovation 2.5 Conclusions 3 Technology Campuses: emergence & development 3.1 Introduction 3.1.1 Chapter aim and questions 3.1.2 Methods 3.2 Emergence and development of technology campuses 3.2.1 The post-war period & the atomic age: the origin of the R & D Park and Nuclear power in technology campuses 3.2.2 The space age & ICT industrial revolution: the emergence of the Asian technology campuses 3.2.3 The digital & information Age: Global coverage and hybrid developments 3.2.4 Answers to guiding sub-questions 3.3 Distinct patterns in the demand for technology campuses 3.3. 1 The Triple Helix as main stakeholder developing technology campuses 3.3.2 The strategic campus: goals on technology campuses and cities 3.3.3 Answers to guiding sub-questions 3.4 Distinct patterns in the supply of technology campuses 3.4. 1 The operational campus: the form and function of technology in cities / regions 3.4.2 Answers to guiding sub - questions 3.5 Conclusions 4 The built environment as catalyst for innovation: a conceptual framework 4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 Chapter aim and questions 4.1.2 Methods 4. 1.3 Innovation and the built environment insights from theory and practice 4.1.4 Research proposition 4.2 Towards a conceptual framework explaining the built environment as catalyst for innovation 4.2.1 Logic of the framework 4.2.2 The input - conditions leading to innovation and their relationships] 4.3 The conceptual framework and the methodological design of Part III 4. 3.1 Case study research 4. 3.2 Case selection 4. 3.3 Data collection, analysis and synthesis 4.4 Conclusions PART III Explanatory research 5 Chapter 5 5.1 Introduction 5. 1.1 Chapter aim and questions 5. 1.2 Approach and methods 5. 1.3 The HTCE 5. 1.4 The city of Eindhoven 5.2 Conditions stimulating innovation in HTCE and Brainport - Eindhoven region 5. 2.1 Concentration of innovators: R & D as the engine of a high - tech industrial cluster 5. 2.2 Innovation area: HTCE campus at the heart of Brainport Eindhoven region 5. 2.3 Density of functions: the HTCE community generating diversity 5. 2.4 Flow in incentives: the entrepreneurial tradition of the Triple Helix in Brainport 5. 2.5 Innovation climate: Reinvention of Eindhoven based on its natural strengths 5.2.6 The presence of a catalyst: the development of HTCE facilitating innovation 5.3 The development of HTCE as catalyst for innovation 5. 3.1 Campus intervention A: Intended accommodation strategy towards concentration 5. 3.2 Campus intervention B: Representative facilities 5. 3.3 Campus intervention C: Shared facilities 5. 3.4 Campus intervention D: Flexible facilities 5. 3.5 Campus intervention E: Physical connectors 5.4 Discussion 5.4.1 Relationships between the campus interventions as catalysts for innovation 5.4.2 Stakeholder's perspectives on campus interventions as catalysts for innovation 5.4.3 Final remarks and case recommendations 5.5 Conclusions 6 The MIT Campus in Cambridge - Boston area 6.1 Introduction 6. 1.1 Chapter aim and question 6. 1.2 Approach and methods 6. 1.3 The MIT campus 6. 1.4 The city of Cambridge 6.2 Conditions stimulating innovation in MIT and Cambridge - Boston area 6.2.1 Concentration of innovators: MIT leading a prestigious science and technology cluster 6.2.2 Innovation area: MIT campus at the heart of the Cambridge - Boston area 6.2.3 Density of functions: the MIT community generating diversity 6.2.4 Flow in incentives: the entrepreneurial tradition of the Triple Helix in Massachusetts 6.2.5 Innovation climate: Massachusetts adapting the shift of technology over time 6.2.6 The presence of a catalyst: the development of MIT campus accelerating innovation 6. 3 The development of MIT campus as a catalyst for innovation 6. 3.1 Campus intervention A: Land acquisition 6. 3.2 Campus intervention B: Urban area development 6. 3.3 Campus intervention C: Shared facilities 6. 3.4 Campus intervention D: Flexible facilities 6. 3.5 Campus intervention E: Physical connectors 6.4 Discussion 6.4.1 Relationships between the campus interventions as a catalysts for innovation 6.4 .2 Stakeholder’s perspectives on campus interventions as catalysts for innovation 6. 4.3 Final remarks and case recommendations 6.5 Conclusions 7 Case comparison 7.1 Introduction 7. 1.1 Chapter aim and questions 7. 1.2 Approach and methods 7.1.3 Two technology campuses in two cities aiming to stimulate innovation the nature of their differences and similarities 7.2 Conditions stimulating innovation in HTCE and MIT campus 7. 2.1 Concentration of innovators 7.2.2 Innovation area 7. 2.3 Density of functions 7.2.4 Flow of incentives 7.2.5 Innovation climate 7.2.6 The presence of a catalyst: campuses ' developments facilitating the conditions for innovation 7.3 Discussion 7.4 Conclusions 8 The built environment as catalyst for innovation: a conceptual model 8.1 Introduction 8.1.1 Chapter aim and questions 8.1. 2 Approach and methods. 8.2 Towards a conceptual model of the built environment as a catalyst for innovation 8. 2.1 Purpose of the model 8. 2.2 Logic of the model 8. 2.3 Hypothesis and propositions 8. 2.4 Discussion 8. 3 The campus decision-maker toolbox 8. 3.1 The need for campus-specific information 8. 3.2 Information to support decisions in technology campuses 8.4 Conclusions PART IV Conclusions 9 Conclusions and recommendations 9. 1 Introduction 9.2 Research findings 9. 2.1 Exploratory research: A conceptual framework 9. 2.2 Explanatory research: a conceptual model and tools to support campus decisions 9.3 Impact of the findings 9.3.1 Theoretical insights 9.3.2 Practical implications 9.4 Reflections on the quality of the results 9. 4.1 Exploratory research 9. 4.2 Explanatory research 9.5 Further research References Appendix A Qualitative survey protocol Appendix B Compendium of technology campuses Appendix C Analysis of the operational campus Appendix D Case Study Protocol - HTCE Appendix E Output indicators of innovation in HTCE and Brainport - Eindhoven region Appendix F Case study Protocol - MIT campus Appendix G Output indicators of innovation in MIT and Cambridge
650		0	_9196863 _aArchitecture and Planning.
650		0	_9196975 _aArchitecture/ Buildings / Public, Commercial & Industrial.
650		0	_992375 _aEnvironment planning
650		0	_9196854 _aArchitecture and construction.
650		0	_977988 _aCollege buildings
942			_2lcc _c6 _hNA6602.T4 _kGeneral _mM34 2016