| 000 | 01851nam a2200289Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 297465 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20200829062646.0 | ||
| 008 | 090629s2009 ilua b 001 0 eng | ||
| 010 | _a2009026900 | ||
| 020 | _a9781604425710 | ||
| 020 | _a1604425717 | ||
| 035 |
_a(OCoLC)421949874 _z(OCoLC)449894094 |
||
| 040 | _aPUCPR | ||
| 049 | _acicg | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKF 8915 _b.B577 2009 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a347.73/75 _222 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aBosanac, Paul. _9203620 _2Local |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aLitigation logic _ba practical guide to effective argument _cPaul Bosanac. |
| 260 |
_aChicago _bAmerican Bar Association _cc2009. |
||
| 300 |
_axvii, 486 _bill. _c23 cm. |
||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references and index. | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aThe legal logic flow chart -- The rules of legal logic -- Prohibited arguments -- Ad hominem (abusive): personal attacks -- Ad hominem (circumstantial): bias and prejudice -- Tu quoque: saying one thing, doing another -- Poisoning the well -- Appeal to authority -- Accent: emphasizing certain words -- Equivocation: shifts in meaning -- Amphiboly: which meaning is intended? -- Hypostatization: expressing abstractions -- Appealing to ignorance -- Pity: appealing to sympathy -- Hurling epithets -- Humor and ridicule -- Appealing to the mob -- Slippery slope -- Reductio ad absurdum -- Two wrongs rarely make a right -- Threats, force, and fear -- Begging the question -- The complex question -- False cause -- False analogy -- Either/or: hobson's choice -- Genetic: attacking the origin -- Red herrings -- Straw man -- Division: painting with the same brush -- Composition: one bad apple -- Sweeping generalizations -- Hasty generalizations -- Lies, damn lies, and statistics. | |
| 650 | 0 | 0 |
_aTrial practice _zUnited States. _9181455 |
| 650 | 0 | 0 |
_aLogic _9127225 _2Local |
| 650 | 0 | 0 |
_aForensic oratory _997878 _2Local |
| 999 |
_c216555 _d216555 |
||