Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

"Eye-opening, thought-provoking, and enlightening."

--USA Today

"An indispensable guide to the business logic of the networked era."

--Clay Shirky, author of Here Comes Everybody

"A stimulating exercise in thinking really, really big."

--San Jose Mercury News

What Would Google Do? is an indispensable manual for survival and success in today's internet-driven marketplace. By "reverse engineering the fastest growing company in the history of the world," author Jeff Jarvis, proprietor of Buzzmachine.com, one of the Web's most widely respected media blogs, offers indispensible strategies for solving the toughest new problems facing businesses today. With a new afterword from the author, What Would Google Do? is the business book that every leader or potential leader in every industry must read.

Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics

• WWGD?(p. 1)
• Google Rules(p. 9)
• New Relationship(p. 11)
• Give the people control and we will use it
• Dell hell
• Your worst customer is your best friend
• Your best customer is your partner
• New Architecture(p. 24)
• The link changes everything
• Do what you do best and link to the rest
• Join a network
• Be a platform
• Think distributed
• New Publicness(p. 40)
• If you're not searchable, you won't be found
• Everybody needs Googlejuice
• Life is public, so is business
• Your customers are your ad agency
• New Society(p. 48)
• Elegant organization
• New Economy(p. 54)
• Small is the new big
• The post-scarcity economy
• Join the open-source, gift economy
• The mass market is dead-long live the mass of niches
• Google commodifies everything
• Welcome to the Google economy
• New Business Reality(p. 70)
• Atoms are a drag
• Middlemen are doomed
• Free is a business model
• Decide what business you're in
• New Attitude(p. 82)
• There is an inverse relationship between control and trust
• Trust the people
• Listen
• New Ethic(p. 91)
• Make mistakes well
• Life is a beta
• Be honest
• Be transparent
• Collaborate
• Don't be evil
• New Speed(p. 103)
• Answers are instantaneous
• Life is live
• Mobs form in a flash
• New Imperatives(p. 109)
• Beware the cash cow in the coal mine
• Encourage, enable, and protect innovation
• Simplify, simplify
• Get out of the way
• If Google Ruled the World(p. 119)
• Media(p. 123)
• The Google Times: Newspapers, post-paper
• Googlewood: Entertainment, opened up
• GoogleCollins: Killing the book to save it
• Advertising(p. 145)
• And now, a word from Google's sponsors
• Retail(p. 153)
• Google Eats: A business built on openness
• Google Shops: A company built on people
• Utilities(p. 162)
• Google Power & Light: What Google would do
• GT&T: What Google should do
• Manufacturing(p. 172)
• The Googlemobile: From secrecy to sharing
• Google Cola: We're more than consumers
• Service(p. 182)
• Google Air: A social marketplace of customers
• Google Real Estate: Information is power
• Money(p. 189)
• Google Capital: Money makes networks
• The First Bank of Google: Markets minus middlemen
• Public Welfare(p. 199)
• St. Google's Hospital: The benefits of publicness
• Google Mutual Insurance: The business of cooperation
• Public Institutions(p. 210)
• Google U: Opening education
• The United States of Google: Geeks rule
• Exceptions(p. 222)
• PR and lawyers: Hopeless
• God and Apple: Beyond Google?
• Generation G(p. 229)
• Continuing the conversation(p. 243)
• Acknowledgments and disclosures(p. 245)
• Index(p. 247)

Extracto provisto por Syndetics

What Would Google Do? Chapter One WWGD? It seems as if no company, executive, or institution truly understands how to survive and prosper in the internet age. Except Google. So, faced with most any challenge today, it makes sense to ask: WWGD? What would Google do? In management, commerce, news, media, manufacturing, marketing, service industries, investing, politics, government, and even education and religion, answering that question is a key to navigating a world that has changed radically and forever. That world is upside-down, inside-out, counterintuitive, and confusing. Who could have imagined that a free classified service could have had a profound and permanent effect on the entire newspaper industry, that kids with cameras and internet connections could gather larger audiences than cable networks could, that loners with keyboards could bring down politicians and companies, and that dropouts could build companies worth billions? They didn't do it by breaking rules. They operate by new rules of a new age, among them: Customers are now in charge. They can be heard around the globe and have an impact on huge institutions in an instant. People can find each other anywhere and coalesce around you--or against you. The mass market is dead, replaced by the mass of niches. "Markets are conversations," decreed The Cluetrain Manifesto , the seminal work of the internet age, in 2000. That means the key skill in any organization today is no longer marketing but conversing. We have shifted from an economy based on scarcity to one based on abundance. The control of products or distribution will no longer guarantee a premium and a profit. Enabling customers to collaborate with you--in creating, distributing, marketing, and supporting products--is what creates a premium in today's market. The most successful enterprises today are networks--which extract as little value as possible so they can grow as big as possible--and the platforms on which those networks are built. Owning pipelines, people, products, or even intellectual property is no longer the key to success. Openness is. Google's founders and executives understand the change brought by the internet. That is why they are so successful and powerful, running what The Times of London dubbed "the fastest growing company in the history of the world." The same is true of a few disruptive capitalists and quasi-capitalists such as Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook; Craig Newmark, who calls himself founder and customer service representative--no joke--at craigslist; Jimmy Wales, cofounder of Wikipedia; Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon; and Kevin Rose, creator of Digg. They see a different world than the rest of us and make different decisions as a result, decisions that make no sense under old rules of old industries that are now blown apart thanks to these new ways and new thinkers. That is why the smart response to all this change is to ask what these disrupters--what Mark, Craig, Jimmy, Jeff, Kevin, and, of course, Google--would do. Google generously shares its own philosophy on its web site, setting out the "10 things Google has found to be true." They are smart but obvious PowerPoint lines helpful in employee indoctrination (especially necessary when your headcount explodes by 50 percent in a year--to 16,000 at the end of 2007 and to 20,000 before the end of the following year): "Focus on the user and all else will follow," Google decrees. "It's best to do one thing really, really well. . . . Fast is better than slow. . . . You can make money without doing evil. . . . There's always more information out there. . . . The need for information crosses all borders. . . ." These are useful, but they don't tell the entire story. There's more to learn from watching Google. The question I ask in the title is about thinking in new ways, facing new challenges, solving problems with new solutions, seeing new opportunities, and understanding a different way to look at the structure of the economy and society. I try to see the world as Google sees it, analyzing and deconstructing its success from a distance so we can apply what we learn to our own companies, institutions, and careers. Together, we will reverse-engineer Google. You can bring this same discipline to other competitors, companies, and leaders whose success you find puzzling but admirable. In fact, you must. Google is our model for thinking in new ways because it is so singularly successful. Hitwise, which measures internet traffic, reported that Google had 71 percent share of searches in the United States and 87 percent in the United Kingdom in 2008. With its acquisition of ad-serving company DoubleClick in 2008, Google controlled 69 percent of online ad serving, according to Attributor, and 24 percent of online ad revenue, according to IDC. In the U.K., Google's ad revenue grew past the largest single commercial TV entity, ITV, in 2008, and it is next expected to surpass the revenue of all British national newspapers combined. It is still exploding: Google's traffic in 2007 was up 22.4 percent in a year. Google no longer says how many servers its runs--estimates run into the millions--and it has stopped saying how many pages it monitors, but when it started in 1998, it indexed 26 million pages; by 2000, it tracked one billion; and in mid-2008 it said it followed one trillion web addresses. In 2007 and again in 2008, says the Millward Brown BrandZ Top 100, Google was the number one brand in the world. By contrast, Yahoo and AOL, each a former king of the online hill, are already has-beens. They operate under the old rules. They control content and distribution and think they can own customers, relationships, and attention. They create destinations and have the hubris to think customers should come to them. They spend a huge proportion of their revenue on marketing to get those people there and work hard to keep them there. Yahoo! is the last old-media company. Google is the first post-media company. Unlike Yahoo, Google is not a portal. It is a network and a platform. Google thinks in distributed ways. It goes to the people. There are bits of Google spread all over the web. About a third of Google's revenue--expected to total $20 billion in 2008--is earned not at Google.com but at sites all over the internet. Here's how they do it: The Google AdSense box on the home page of my blog, Buzzmachine.com, makes me part of Google's empire. Google sends me money for those ads. Google sends me readers via search. Google benefits by showing those readers more of its ads, which it can make more relevant, effective, and profitable because it knows what my site is about. I invited Google in because Google helps me do what I want to do. What Would Google Do? . Copyright © by Jeff Jarvis. Reprinted by permission of HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. Available now wherever books are sold. Excerpted from What Would Google Do? by Jeff Jarvis All rights reserved by the original copyright owners. Excerpts are provided for display purposes only and may not be reproduced, reprinted or distributed without the written permission of the publisher.

Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics

Library Journal Review

Verdict: A well-indexed and thought-provoking survey of how the Internet-and specifically Google-have changed the business landscape, and what companies must do to keep up. Highly recommended for public, academic, and business libraries. Background: Jarvis (interactive journalism, Graduate Sch. of Journalism, CUNY; founding editor, Entertainment Weekly) argues that services and industries can no longer survive as exclusive gatekeepers of information. Google and the Internet have irrevocably changed market expectations-customers now want and expect control over the choices they make. Google dominates the new advertising marketplace through its highly successful business model as developer of freely available information platforms focusing on client interaction. Jarvis demonstrates how businesses can flourish by focusing on customer and client dialog and defining the scope of their services and products within niche markets. [See LJ Talks to Jeff Jarvis.-Ed.]-Robert L. Balliot, Bristol, RI (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

Publishers Weekly Review

This scattered collection of rambling rants lauding Google's abilities to harness the power of the "Internet Age" generally misses the mark. Blog impresario Jarvis uses the company's success to trace aspects of the new customer-driven, user-generated, niche-market-oriented, customized and collaborative world. While his insights are stimulating, Jarvis's tone is acerbic and condescending; equally off-putting is his pervasive name-dropping. The book picks up in a section on media, where the author finally launches a fascinating discussion of how businesses--especially media and entertainment industries--can continue to evolve and profit by using Google's strategies. Unfortunately, Jarvis may have lost the reader by that point as his attempt to cover too many topics reads more like a series of frenzied blog posts than a manifesto for the Internet age. (Jan.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved

Booklist Review

Jarvis, columnist and blogger about media, presents his ideas for surviving and prospering in the Internet age, with its new set of rules for emerging technologies as well as industries such as retail, manufacturing, and service. We learn that customers are now in charge, people anywhere can find each other and join forces to support a company's efforts or oppose them, life and business are more public, conversation has replaced marketing, and openness is the key to success. Jarvis' other laws include being a platform (help users create products, businesses, communities, and networks of their own); hand over control to anyone; middlemen are doomed; and your worst customer is your best friend, and your best customer is your partner. Jarvis offers thought-provoking observations and valuable examples for individuals and businesses seeking to fully participate in our Internet culture and maximize the opportunities it offers. It is unclear what role Google played, if any, in the preparation of this book, which provides excellent advertising for the company.--Whaley, Mary Copyright 2009 Booklist