Judicial applications of artificial intelligence edited by Giovanni Sartor, Karl Branting.
Detalles de publicación: Dordrecht Boston Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998.Descripción: 220 p.: ill. 25 cmISBN:- 0792354729
- K552 .J83 1998
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca de Derecho Mons. Fremiot Torres Oliver Colección General biblioteca derecho | K 552 .J83 1998 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 70000000589437 |
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
The judiciary is in the early stages of a transformation in which AI (Artificial Intelligence) technology will help to make the judicial process faster, cheaper, and more predictable without compromising the integrity of judges' discretionary reasoning. Judicial decision-making is an area of daunting complexity, where highly sophisticated legal expertise merges with cognitive and emotional competence. How can AI contribute to a process that encompasses such a wide range of knowledge, judgment, and experience? Rather than aiming at the impossible dream (or nightmare) of building an automatic judge, AI research has had two more practical goals: producing tools to support judicial activities, including programs for intelligent document assembly, case retrieval, and support for discretionary decision-making; and developing new analytical tools for understanding and modeling the judicial process, such as case-based reasoning and formal models of dialectics, argumentation, and negotiation. Judges, squeezed between tightening budgets and increasing demands for justice, are desperately trying to maintain the quality of their decision-making process while coping with time and resource limitations. Flexible AI tools for decision support may promote uniformity and efficiency in judicial practice, while supporting rational judicial discretion. Similarly, AI may promote flexibility, efficiency and accuracy in other judicial tasks, such as drafting various judicial documents. The contributions in this volume exemplify some of the directions that the AI transformation of the judiciary will take.
"Reprinted from Artificial intelligence and law 6(2-4)1998."
Pages also numbered 105-324.
Includes bibliographical references.
Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics
- Introduction: Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence(p. 1)
- Automating Judicial Document Drafting: A Discourse-Based Approach(p. 7)
- Criminal Sentencing and Intelligent Decision Support(p. 47)
- The Application of Judicial Intelligence and 'Rules' to Systems Supporting Discretionary Judicial Decision-Making(p. 99)
- Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue Game(p. 127)
- The Judge and the Computer: How Best 'Decision Support'?(p. 185)
- Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence(p. 207)