Imagen de portada de Amazon
Imagen de Amazon.com
Imagen de cubierta Syndetics
Portada de Syndetics
Imagen de OpenLibrary

Race, evolution, and behavior a life history perspective J. Philippe Rushton.

Por: Detalles de publicación: New Brunswick, N.J., USA Transaction Publishers [c1995]Descripción: xviii, 334 p ill. 24 cmISBN:
  • 1560001461
Tema(s): Clasificación CDD:
  • 573.2 20
Clasificación LoC:
  • GN281.4 .R87 1995
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Imagen de cubierta Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Biblioteca de origen Colección Ubicación en estantería Signatura topográfica Materiales especificados Info Vol URL Copia número Estado Notas Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras Reserva de ítems Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar Reservas para cursos
Libro Biblioteca de Mayagüez Colección General mb GN281.4 .R87 1995 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) Disponible 50000001898963
Total de reservas: 0

Includes bibliographical references (p. 285-315) and indexes.

Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics

CHOICE Review

Rushton's work is one of three contemporary books that have resurrected, in various guises, the myth of racial differences in intelligence. Richard J. Herrnstein and Charles Murray's The Bell Curve (CH, May'95) has received more public notoriety, possibly due to better costuming and greater verbiage, but Rushton's work is at least as inflammatory. The basic thesis that Rushton pursues is that the major groups of humanity evolved under conditions that fostered differing reproductive strategies. Evolution and reproduction can be viewed as a game, the goal of which is to maximize the rate at which one passes genes along to the next generation relative to other members of the species. Different species are known to adopt strategies for playing the game. Some attempt to maximize care for a small number of offspring, thereby ensuring that the few offspring will all survive to reproduce themselves; others minimize parental care and investment while maximizing reproductive rates. These alternatives are referred to as the K-strategy (the former) and r-strategy. It is Rushton's contention that some human "races" are more K-strategists than others, and that this has noticeably affected the intellectual capabilities of members of each group. It is difficult to know where to start in pointing to the errors in concept and fact in the book. For one, the r-K continuum is applicable to different species, but not to groups within a species. The craniometric data is fraught with problems, including poor technique and racial biases. Psychologists are hardly clear as to what intelligence is and how to measure it, but virtually all do agree that within the human species, brain size is a poor indicator. The classification of humans into three major races is anthropologically naive. It is a sad commentary that works such as Rushton's are still referred to as scientific by some. The only positive aspect is that his book proves that freedom of expression is still operating in the US. M. L. Weiss; Wayne State University
Compartir
logopucpr-y-vive

Contáctanos

¡Queremos saber de ti!

Tel. 787.841.2000 Ext. 1801

bibliotecavaldes@pucpr.edu

⁣Búscanos en las redes

© 2026 Desarrollado por Ignite Online • All Rights Reserved • Powered by Koha.