Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics
Library Journal Review
According to Rauch, contributing editor of the National Journal , the main problem of our national government is not gridlock--the inability to act. Indeed, many new laws are passed each year. Instead, government lacks the flexibility to act in such a way as to deal effectively with the nation's problems. Rauch calls this condition demosclerosis and claims that it has been intensified in recent decades by the increasing number of interest groups with vested interests in retaining existing governmental programs. Such groups are amenable at most only to marginal programmatic change. Rauch makes a strong case that our governmental arteries are clogged and that interest groups have played a major role in creating this condition. He also performs the valuable service of pointing out how widespread interest group membership is among the public. Although there is a tendency for many people to view interest groups as organizations that other people belong to, Rauch recognizes that ``Groups `R' Us.'' Highly recommended for academic and public libraries.-- Thomas H. Ferrell, Univ. of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Publishers Weekly Review
Declaring ``We have met the special interests, and they are us,'' National Journal contributing editor Rauch ( Kindly Inquisitors ) here offers a tart, stimulating essay on government failure to solve domestic problems. Blending analysis and reportage, he argues that the pursuit and entrenchment of government benefits helps special interests and a ``parasite economy'' of lobbyists but harms the nation as a whole. The least organized groups--the young and unborn--are most neglected and threatened by the federal deficit. While Rauch supports such ``process reforms'' as public campaign financing, he recommends the privatization of services and the elimination of subsidies--to the sugar industry, for example--and of programs that favor an identifiable group, profession or region. He suggests that, despite rhetoric to the contrary, the Clinton administration's economic plan did not try to restructure government. While Rauch admonishes both liberals and conservatives, critics on the left might fault him for not emphasizing that taxation in the U.S. is much lower than in most industrialized countries. Author tour. (Apr.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
CHOICE Review
This is a compelling little essay by a National Journal Washington reporter. The analysis examines the side effects of proliferating US interest groups. Rauch finds demosclerosis to be the result of government's progressive loss of the ability to adapt in the face of too many mass membership groups. With groups easier to organize, coalition politics the norm, and grassroots advocacy the typical strategy, government rarely says no. The essay nicely lays out the problem, basing its logic on the works of Mancur Olson and other group scholars. Groups, their members, and the policies that reward them bog down government's capacity for responding to crises and major problems. This brings economic and political wastes that drain society. While government is incredibly active and passes much legislation, important matters get lost in the sheer volume of political activity. The prescription is simple. Rather than reform lobbying or campaign financing, or establish term limits, Rauch suggests generating a healthy skepticism of big government. His rules for policy makers are favor the poorest, the most diffuse interests, and the youngest; emphasize investment policies over those that consume federal dollars; suspect organized interests and those who want something for nothing; avoid what the market can duplicate; do not do anything just because it is nice or possibly useful; and always cut old programs that would not be started over. General through graduate readers. W. P. Browne; Central Michigan University
Booklist Review
Our national inability to solve our worst problems--lousy schools, rampant hooliganism, the deficit, etc.--is usually ascribed to a presumably partisan phenomenon called gridlock. But forget gridlock, this lucid, persuasive public policy analysis says. The reason the government can't get anything done is that there are too many citizen-whiner organizations--politely if not respectfully known as lobbies--pressing to have their benefits locked into law. Once they succeed, secondary groups of whiners (the American Association of Retired Persons is a classic example) arise to see to it that their programs are never even trimmed, let alone eliminated; if anything, program budgets only expand. These immortal boondoggles (including such stellar pork barrels as the sugar, tobacco, and dairy subsidies) tie up increasingly more revenue, preventing through financial privation any new actions to deal with emergent problems as well as any revision of ineffective ways of dealing with old ones. And so, the government of the richest nation in history becomes too poor to deal with its own breakdown; democracy is frozen--demosclerotic. Rauch proposes more forceful presidential leadership, more citizen forbearance, and--stiff medicine, this--more taxes and more budget cuts as necessary means to curb the ill effects of a disease he thinks can never be eradicated but might be contained so that it becomes chronic but not fatal. ~--Ray Olson
