Blogging David L. Hudson.
Series Point/counterpointDetalles de publicación: New York Chelsea House Publishers c2008.Descripción: 107 p. ill. 24 cmISBN:- 9780791096451 (acid-free paper)
- 0791096459 (acid-free paper)
- 006.7 H8851b 22
- TK5105.8884 .H83 2008
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca Encarnación Valdés Colección General bev | 006.7 H8851b (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 80000002386368 |
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
The increased popularity of Weblogs, or ""blogs,"" has prompted many questions: Should blogging about a candidate be considered a political advertisement, subject to campaign finance laws? Should bloggers receive the same access to public officials and events as traditional journalists do? Should schools be able to regulate their students' blogs? ""Blogging"" tackles these issues by examining this hot-button topic from different angles. Full-color photographs, comprehensive sidebars, and relevant elements of the argument add value to this useful new resource for students of current issues.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 92-94) and index.
Point: many bloggers are journalists who deserve the protection of a reporter shield law -- Counterpoint: bloggers should not receive the protections of mainstream journalists -- Point: employees should have the right to blog without fear of reprisal from employers -- Counterpoint: employers should have wide latitude to discipline bloggers for comments detrimental to the workplace -- Point: school officials don't have authority to regulate students' off-campus blogging -- Counterpoint: school officials should have broad leeway to regulate student blogs and student online speech -- Conclusion: controversies over the blogosphere are here to stay.
Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics
- Foreword(p. 6)
- Introduction: Blogging(p. 10)
- Point: Many Bloggers Are Journalists Who Deserve the Protection of a Reporter Shield Law(p. 16)
- Counterpoint: Bloggers Should Not Receive the Protections of Mainstream Journalists(p. 29)
- Point: Employees Should Have the Right to Blog Without Fear of Reprisal From Employers(p. 40)
- Counterpoint: Employers Should Have Wide Latitude to Discipline Bloggers for Comments Detrimental to the Workplace(p. 51)
- Point: School Officials Don't Have Authority to Regulate Students' Off-Campus Blogging(p. 61)
- Counterpoint: School Officials Should Have Broad Leeway to Regulate Student Blogs and Student Online Speech(p. 70)
- Conclusion: Controversies Over the Blogosphere Are Here to Stay(p. 80)
- Notes(p. 88)
- Resources(p. 92)
- Elements of the Argument(p. 96)
- Appendix Beginning Legal Research(p. 98)
- Index(p. 102)
Extracto provisto por Syndetics
Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics
David L. Hudson Jr. is a research attorney with the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt UniversityAlan Marzilli, M.A., J.D., is a program associate with Advocates for Human Potential, Inc.