TY  - BOOK
AU  - Martinez,Roberto
TI  - Question of John the Baptist and Jesus' indictment of the religious leaders: a critical analysis of Luke 7:18-35 
SN  - 1608994597
U1  - .M374 2011 BS 2595.52
PY  - 2011///
CY  - Eugene, Or.
PB  - Cascade Books
KW  - Jesus Christ
KW  - John,
KW  - Bible
KW  - Luke, VII, 18-35
KW  - Criticism, Narrative
N1  - Revised version of the author's thesis (Ph.D.)--Catholic University of America, 2010; Includes bibliographical references (p. 197-206) and indexes; Luke 7:18-35 : a historical survey -- The origin, redaction and literary function of Luke 7:18-35 -- A narrative-critical interpretation of 7:18-28 --  A narrative-critical interpretation of 7:29-35 -- Conclusion: A narrative-critical interpretation of Luke 7:18-35
N2  - Since the time of Jerome, scholars have tried to explain why John the Baptist asks Jesus if he is "the one who is to come" (Matt 11:2—6; Luke 7:18—23) after he had apparently identified him as "the lamb of God" (John 1:29—34). The puzzling question is part of one of the longest fragments of traditional material in the New Testament dealing with the Baptist and Jesus. The present study critically examines the Lukan version of this double tradition normally attributed to Q, which includes John's question as well as Jesus testimony about the Baptist (7:24—28) and his reproach of the religious leaders (7:29—35). Martínez investigates the narrative elements of the passage and shows how Luke 7:18—35 is part of a literary pattern within a section whose main goal is to clarify the identity of Jesus. The study argues that the tradition in Matthew 11:2—19 and Luke 7:18—35 deserves to be interpreted differently in the Gospel of Luke and explains how Luke integrantes John's apparent ignorance of Jesus as well as Jesus indictment of the religious leaders into his his literary scheme. Finally, Martínez shows how Luke puts this tradition about John and Jesus at the service of his theocentric and christological perspectives and offers an alternative explanation to the prevailing interpretation of Joh's question.
ER  -