02734cam a22003257a 450000100090000000300060000900500170001500800410003201000170007302000150009002000180010503500240012304000370014704200140018408200270019810000230022524501420024826000430039030000380043333600200047133700160049133800190050750000900052650400660061650502710068252013430095360000290229660000310232563000520235616723467PUCPR20230320154251.0110406s2011    orua     bm   001 0 eng d  a  2011281241  a1608994597  a9781608994595  a(OCoLC)ocn703218679  aYDXCPcYDXCPdDTMdDLCbspaerda  alccopycat  2BS 2595.52a.M374 20111 aMartinez, Roberto.10aQuestion of John the Baptist and Jesus' indictment of the religious leaders :ba critical analysis of Luke 7:18-35 /cRoberto Martínez.  aEugene, Or. :bCascade Books,c©2011.  axiii, 231 pages :bill. ;c23 cm.  2rdacontentbtxt  2rdamediabn  2rdacarrierbnc  aRevised version of the author's thesis (Ph.D.)--Catholic University of America, 2010.  aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 197-206) and indexes.0 aLuke 7:18-35 : a historical survey -- The origin, redaction and literary function of Luke 7:18-35 -- A narrative-critical interpretation of 7:18-28 --  A narrative-critical interpretation of 7:29-35 -- Conclusion: A narrative-critical interpretation of Luke 7:18-35.  aSince the time of Jerome, scholars have tried to explain why John the Baptist asks Jesus if he is "the one who is to come" (Matt 11:2—6; Luke 7:18—23) after he had apparently identified him as "the lamb of God" (John 1:29—34). The puzzling question is part of one of the longest fragments of traditional material in the New Testament dealing with the Baptist and Jesus. The present study critically examines the Lukan version of this double tradition normally attributed to Q, which includes John's question as well as Jesus testimony about the Baptist (7:24—28) and his reproach of the religious leaders (7:29—35). Martínez investigates the narrative elements of the passage and shows how Luke 7:18—35 is part of a literary pattern within a section whose main goal is to clarify the identity of Jesus. The study argues that the tradition in Matthew 11:2—19 and Luke 7:18—35 deserves to be interpreted differently in the Gospel of Luke and explains how Luke integrantes John's apparent ignorance of Jesus as well as Jesus indictment of the religious leaders into his his literary scheme. Finally, Martínez shows how Luke puts this tradition about John and Jesus at the service of his theocentric and christological perspectives and offers an alternative explanation to the prevailing interpretation of Joh's question. 00aJesus ChristxConflicts.00aJohn,cthe Baptist, Saint.00aBible.pLuke, VII, 18-35xCriticism, Narrative.