03840cam a2200553Ii 4500 on1252763792 OCoLC 20220209192149.0 m d cr |n||||||||| 210526s2021 sz a ob 001 0 eng d 9783030710408 (electronic bk.) 3030710408 (electronic bk.) 9783030710392 3030710394 10.1007/978-3-030-71040-8 doi 2935986 (OCoLC)1252763792 YDX eng rda YDX GW5XE OCLCO EBLCP N$T MAIN QP360.5 .B46 2021 JMR bicssc PSY008000 bisacsh JMR thema 612.8/233 23 Benetka, Gerhard, author. Discussing cognitive neuroscience : psychology, neurophysiology, and philosophy on the mind, body and brain / Gerhard Benetka, Hans Werbik. Cham : Springer, [2021] ©2021 1 online resource (171 pages) illustrations ; text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier Annals of theoretical psychology ; volume 17 Includes bibliographical references and index. Chapter 1. Critique of neuropsychology A polemic -- Chapter 2. Living body (Leib) or physical dataset? Antonio Damsio and Thomas Fuchs holistic conception of the human being as opposite standpoint to reductionist models -- Chapter 3. The person and the brain -- Chapter 4. The neuropsychological discourse in philosophical critique - Bennett/Hacker and the consequences -- Chapter 5. Persistent biologism and the misuse of neuropsychology an activity-theoretical contribution -- Chapter 6. Measuring free will with the readiness potential? New data on an old misunderstanding -- Chapter 7. The brain as protagonist Without the brain all is nothing -- Chapter 8. Is it possible to simulate thought The sciences philosophy, psychology and neuroscience share the basis that all refer to the human being. Therefore, an interdisciplinary collaboration would be desirable. The exchange of criticism is an essential requirement for interdisciplinary collaboration. Criticism must be heard and if possible considered. Indeed, criticism can be valid or unwarranted. However, whether criticism is unwarranted can only emerge from discussion and conversation. In the discussion of cognitive neuroscience, some criticism can easily be considered (such as the mereological fallacy that represents that talking about the person is substituted with talking bout the brain). Another issue for an interdisciplinary discussion of cognitive neuroscience is the interpretation of the readiness potential including re-considering Benjamin Libet's classic experiments. Additionally, a critical discussion on cognitive neuroscience must address ethical questions, such as the possibility of the abuse of neuroscientific insight. Online resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed May 28, 2021). Added to collection customer.56279.3 Cognitive neuroscience. Electronic books. Werbik, Hans, 1941- author. Print version: 3030710394 9783030710392 (OCoLC)1237344527 Annals of theoretical psychology (Springer (Firm)) ; 17. https://login.ezproxy.pucpr.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2935986 Acceso Remoto EBSCOhost https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=2935986 Acceso en el Campus PUCPR lcc 7 297657 297657 ALA COVID Relief Fund 0 0 ddc 0 0 10 10 45 2021-12-20 0 612.8/233 on1252763792 2021-12-20 00:00:00 2021-12-20 7 0 0 lcc 0 0 12 12 45 2022-02-08 0 QP360.5 .B46 2021 50000003285631 2022-02-08 00:00:00 Ebook c. 1 2022-02-08 7