08700nam a22005413i 4500 EBC4717285 MiAaPQ 20220118142909.0 m o d | cr cnu|||||||| 211129s2016 xx o ||||0 eng d 9789462651531 (electronic bk.) 9789462651524 (MiAaPQ)EBC4717285 (Au-PeEL)EBL4717285 (CaPaEBR)ebr11282545 (CaONFJC)MIL963815 (OCoLC)960701489 MiAaPQ eng rda pn MiAaPQ MiAaPQ KZ7364 .V754 2016 345.07 Vriend, Koen. author Avoiding a Full Criminal Trial : Fair Trial Rights, Diversions and Shortcuts in Dutch and International Criminal Proceedings / Koen Vriend. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016. ©2016. 1 online resource (284 pages) text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier International Criminal Justice Ser. ; v.8 Intro -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Abbreviations -- 1 Full Criminal Proceedings in Decline -- Abstract -- 1.1 The Full Criminal Trial -- 1.2 Purpose and Scope of the Study -- 1.3 Terminology: Diversions, Shortcuts and a Full Criminal Trial -- 1.4 The Normative Framework -- 1.5 Outline of the Book -- References -- 2 Diversions, Shortcuts and the Concept of Fairness -- Abstract -- 2.1 Introduction -- 2.2 Fairness and Evidence Law -- 2.3 Principles and Rules -- 2.4 Participation in Criminal Proceedings -- 2.4.1 Non-compulsion -- 2.4.2 Informed Involvement -- 2.4.3 Challenging the Evidence -- 2.4.4 Reasoned Judgment -- 2.5 Diversions and the Concept of Fairness -- 2.6 Conclusion -- References -- 3 Diversions and Shortcuts in Dutch Law of Criminal Procedure -- Abstract -- 3.1 Introduction -- 3.1.1 Rules of Admissibility -- 3.1.1.1 Intrinsic Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.1.2 Extrinsic Exclusionary Rules -- 3.1.1.3 The Principle of Immediacy -- 3.1.2 Weighing the Evidence -- 3.1.2.1 Conviction Intime and Conviction Raisonnée -- 3.1.2.2 Statutory and Free Systems of Evidence Law -- 3.1.3 Reasoned Judgments -- 3.1.4 Conclusion -- 3.2 Diversions in Dutch Law of Criminal Procedure -- 3.2.1 Introduction -- 3.2.2 The Punitive Order -- 3.2.2.1 Safeguards -- 3.2.2.2 Judicial Supervision -- 3.2.3 The Transaction -- 3.2.3.1 The Legal Nature of the Transaction -- 3.2.3.2 Conditions -- 3.2.3.3 Safeguards -- 3.2.4 The Conditional Dismissal -- 3.2.4.1 Legal Basis -- 3.2.4.2 Conditions -- 3.3 Shortcuts in Dutch Law of Criminal Procedure -- 3.3.1 Introduction -- 3.3.2 Facts of Common Knowledge and Contextual Facts -- 3.3.2.1 Legal Framework -- 3.3.2.2 Different Categories of Facts of Common Knowledge -- 3.3.2.3 Contextual Facts -- Crimes Committed in the Context of an Armed Conflict or a State of War -- 3.3.2.4 The First Post-WWII Years. Joining the German Armed Forces -- Aiding the Enemy During a State of War -- 3.3.2.5 More Recent Cases Regarding International Crimes -- The Case Against Joseph M. -- Appeal Proceedings -- The Case Against Yvonne B. -- The Cases Against Afghan Asylum Seekers -- The Cases Against Dutch Nationals: Van Anraat -- Appeal Proceedings -- The Cases Against Dutch Nationals: Kouwenhoven -- Appeal Proceedings -- 3.3.2.6 Conclusion -- 3.3.3 Chain Evidence -- 3.3.3.1 Legal Framework -- 3.3.3.2 Different Concepts of Chain Evidence -- 'Quasi Chain Evidence' -- 'Superfluous Chain Evidence' -- 'Real Chain Evidence' -- 3.3.4 Confessions -- 3.3.4.1 Legal Framework -- 3.3.4.2 The Confession and the Legal Character of Dutch Criminal Proceedings -- 3.3.4.3 Plea Bargaining in Dutch Criminal Proceedings? -- 3.3.5 Cases Ad Informandum -- 3.3.5.1 Legal Framework -- 3.3.5.2 Ad Informandum Cases as Shortcuts -- 3.3.6 Appeal Proceedings -- 3.3.6.1 Legal Framework -- 3.3.6.2 The Scope of the Appeal Proceedings -- 3.3.6.3 The Character of Appeal Proceedings -- 3.3.6.4 Law in Action: Interviews with Judges -- 3.3.6.5 The Future of Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases -- References -- 4 Diversions and Shortcuts in the Law of International Criminal Procedure -- Abstract -- 4.1 Introduction -- 4.1.1 Preliminary Observations -- 4.1.2 Rules of Admissibility in International Criminal Proceedings -- 4.1.2.1 Intrinsic Exclusionary Rules -- 4.1.2.2 Extrinsic Exclusionary Rules -- The Ad Hoc Tribunals -- The International Criminal Court -- 4.1.3 Weighing the Evidence -- 4.1.3.1 Combining Evidence in International Criminal Proceedings -- 4.1.4 Reasoned Judgments -- 4.1.5 Conclusion -- 4.2 Diversions in the Law of International Criminal Procedure -- 4.2.1 Introduction -- 4.2.2 Guilty Pleas -- 4.2.3 Legal Framework of Guilty Pleas Before the Ad Hoc Tribunals -- 4.2.3.1 Voluntariness. 4.2.3.2 Informed -- 4.2.3.3 Not Equivocal -- 4.2.3.4 Sufficient Factual Basis -- 4.2.3.5 Discretionary Powers of the Trial Chamber? -- 4.2.4 Admissions of Guilt at the ICC -- 4.2.4.1 Introduction -- 4.2.4.2 Legal Framework -- 4.3 Shortcuts in the Law of International Criminal Procedure -- 4.3.1 Introduction -- 4.3.2 Agreed Facts -- 4.3.2.1 The Ad Hoc Tribunals -- 4.3.2.2 The International Criminal Court -- 4.3.3 Judicial Notice of Facts of Common Knowledge -- 4.3.3.1 Introduction -- 4.3.3.2 Legal Framework -- 4.3.3.3 Rationale for Judicial Notice of Facts of Common Knowledge -- 4.3.3.4 Probative Value of Facts of Common Knowledge -- 4.3.3.5 Identifying Facts of Common Knowledge -- 4.3.3.6 Facts of Common Knowledge and the Probandum -- 4.3.3.7 Submission by the Parties or Proprio Motu? -- 4.3.3.8 Judicial Notice and Appeal Proceedings -- 4.3.4 Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts and Documentary Evidence -- 4.3.4.1 Introduction -- 4.3.4.2 Legal Framework -- 4.3.4.3 Rationale for Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts and Documentary Evidence -- 4.3.4.4 Probative Value of Adjudicated Facts and Documentary Evidence -- 4.3.4.5 Documentary Evidence -- 4.3.4.6 Identifying Adjudicated Facts -- 4.3.4.7 Discretionary Power -- 4.3.4.8 Documentary Evidence -- 4.3.4.9 Judicial Notice and the Probandum -- 4.3.4.10 No Legal Characterisations -- 4.3.4.11 Submission by the Parties or Proprio Motu? -- 4.3.4.12 Judicial Notice and Appeal Proceedings -- 4.3.4.13 Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Notice at the Ad Hoc Tribunals -- 4.3.4.14 Concluding Remarks -- 4.3.5 Appeal Proceedings -- 4.3.5.1 Introduction -- 4.3.5.2 Legal Framework -- 4.3.5.3 Additional Evidence on Appeal -- 4.3.5.4 Standard of Review -- References -- 5 Avoiding a Full Criminal Trial: Evading Fairness? -- Abstract -- 5.1 Introduction -- 5.1.1 Waiving Rights -- 5.1.2 Outline. 5.2 Diversions and Shortcuts in Dutch Law of Criminal Procedure -- 5.2.1 Diversions and the Participatory Model of Proof -- 5.2.1.1 The Punitive Order -- 5.2.1.2 The Transaction -- 5.2.1.3 The Conditional Dismissal -- 5.2.2 Shortcuts and the Participatory Model of Proof -- 5.2.2.1 Facts of Common Knowledge -- 5.2.2.2 Chain Evidence -- 5.2.2.3 Confessions and Cases Ad Informandum -- 5.2.2.4 Appeal Proceedings -- 5.3 Diversions and Shortcuts in the Law of International Criminal Procedure -- 5.3.1 Introduction -- 5.3.2 Diversions and the Participatory Model of Proof -- 5.3.2.1 Guilty Pleas and Admissions of Guilt -- 5.3.3 Shortcuts and the Participatory Model of Proof -- 5.3.3.1 Agreed Facts -- 5.3.3.2 Facts of Common Knowledge -- 5.3.3.3 Judicial Notice of Adjudicated Facts -- 5.3.3.4 Appeal Proceedings -- 5.4 Conclusion -- References -- 6 Why Fairness Matters -- 6.1 Conclusion -- 6.2 A Case for Fairness -- 6.3 Recommendations -- Reference -- Index. Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources. Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, Michigan : ProQuest Ebook Central, 2021. Available via World Wide Web. Access may be limited to ProQuest Ebook Central affiliated libraries. Criminal Law. Criminal justice, Administration of 82135 Criminal procedure 82161 Fair trial 94417 Electronic books. Print version: Vriend, Koen Avoiding a Full Criminal Trial The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press,c2016 9789462651524 ProQuest (Firm) International Criminal Justice Ser. https://login.ezproxy.pucpr.edu/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/pucpr-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4717285 Acceso Remoto https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/pucpr-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4717285 Acceso en el Campus PUCPR lcc 7 297125 297125 0 0 ddc 0 0 10 10 45 2021-12-07 0 345.07 EBC4717285 2021-12-07 00:00:00 2021-12-07 7 0 0 lcc 0 0 12 12 45 2022-01-18 0 KZ7364 .V754 2016 50000003283933 2022-01-18 00:00:00 Ebook c. 1 2022-01-18 7