02434nam a2200361Ia 4500001000700000003000600007005001700013008004100030020003300071020003600104035002100140040001000161050002200171082001700193100002800210245019100238260004400429263001100473300001100484490007600495500005900571504005100630505095300681505015901634650004401793650002401837650002801861650002401889650003801913651002001951651002501971830007601996326782OCoLC20160527192318.0980114s1998    mau      b    001 0 eng d  a9041105700 (hb : alk. paper)  a9789041105707 (hb : alk. paper)  a(OCoLC)222920458  aPUCPR00aK 2263b.K65 199800a341.4/812211 aKokott, Juliane.2Local14aThe burden of proof in comparative and international human rights lawbcivil and common law approaches with special reference to the American and German legal systemscby Juliane Kokott.  aBostonbKluwer Law Internationalc1998.  a199804  ap. cm.1 aStudies and materials on the settlement of international disputesvv. 3  aRevision of thesis (S.J.D.)--Harvard University, 1990.  aIncludes bibliographical references and index.0 aCh. 1. Comparative Law Analysis: The American and the German Systems. I. The Two Kinds of Burden of Proof. II. Different Standards of Proof. III. Interrelationship between the Effectiveness of Human Rights and the Rules on Proof. IV. Shortcuts to Proof. V. The Presumption of Constitutionality. VI. Decisions by the Executive. VII. Conclusions to Chapter 1 -- Ch. 2. The Burden of Proof in American Constitutional Law. I. Freedom of Speech and the Press and the Burden of Proof. II. Equal Protection. III. A Related Subject: The Weight of the Burden of Persuasion. IV. Conclusions to Chapter 2 -- Ch. 3. The Burden of Proof in International Human Rights Law. I. The Two Kinds of Burden of Proof. II. The Prohibition of Non-Liquet under International Law. III. The Voluntary Character of International Jurisdiction and Non-Liquet. IV. The Categories of Plaintiff and Defendant. V. Adversarial or Investigatory Character of International Proceedings.8 aVI. Free Evaluation of Evidence and the Measure of Proof. VII. The Burden of Persuasion in International Human Rights Law. VIII. Conclusions to Chapter 3. 0aBurden of proof.zUnited States.2Local 7aHuman rights2Local 7aBurden of proof.2Local 0aHuman rights2Local 0aBurden of proof.zGermany.2Local 7aGermany.2Local 7aUnited States2Local 0aStudies and materials on the settlement of international disputesvv. 3