The five essays : essays on the Supreme Court's Clean Water Act jurisprudence as reflected in Rapanos v. United States United States Supreme Court Vermont Law School Land Use Institute. text bibliography vtu South Royalton, Vt Vermont Law School, Land Use Institute Vermont Journal of Environmental Law 2007 monographic eng

print

iii, 99 p. 25 cm. Introduction L. Kinvin Wroth -- Rapanos v. United State: significant nexus or significant confusion? The failure of the Supreme Court to clearly define the scope of federal wetland jurisdiction Mark Latham -- Rulemaking response to Rapanos: the government's best hope for retaining broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction Stephen M. Johnson -- Any hope for happily ever after? Reflections on Rapanos and the future of the Clean Water Act section 404 program Kim Diana Connolly -- Rapanos and wetland mitigation banking Royal C. Gardner -- Once more, with feeling: reaffirming the limits of Clean Water Act jurisdiction Jonathan H. Adler. edited with an introduction by L. Kinvin Wroth. Includes bibliographical references. United States Wetlands Law and legislation United States Right of property United States KF 5624 .S86 2007 United States PUCPR 070912 20160527200833.0 284288