The Supreme Court and the Clean Water Act  five essays : essays on the Supreme Court's Clean Water Act jurisprudence as reflected in Rapanos v. United States 
 Essays on the Supreme Court's Clean Water Act jurisprudence as reflected in Rapanos v. United States  Rapanos v. United States 
edited with an introduction by L. Kinvin Wroth. 
 - South Royalton, Vt.  Vermont Law School, Land Use Institute  Vermont Journal of Environmental Law  2007. 
 - iii, 99 p.  25 cm. 
<br/><br/>Includes bibliographical references. 
<br/><br/> Introduction  Rapanos v. United State: significant nexus or significant confusion? The failure of the Supreme Court to clearly define the scope of federal wetland jurisdiction  Rulemaking response to Rapanos: the government's best hope for retaining broad Clean Water Act jurisdiction  Any hope for happily ever after? Reflections on Rapanos and the future of the Clean Water Act section 404 program  Rapanos and wetland mitigation banking  Once more, with feeling: reaffirming the limits of Clean Water Act jurisdiction  L. Kinvin Wroth --  Mark Latham --  Stephen M. Johnson --  Kim Diana Connolly --  Royal C. Gardner --  Jonathan H. Adler. 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Corporate Names: </label><br/>United States Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Wetlands--Law and legislation--United States.<br/>Right of property--United States.
<br/><br/><label>LC Class. No.: </label>KF 5624  / .S86 2007