Imagen de portada de Amazon
Imagen de Amazon.com
Imagen de cubierta Syndetics
Portada de Syndetics
Imagen de OpenLibrary

The rise of modern judicial review from constitutional interpretation to judge-made law Christopher Wolfe.

Por: Series Basic series in American governmentDetalles de publicación: New York Basic Books c1986.Descripción: ix, 392 p. 24 cmISBN:
  • 0465070337
Tema(s): Clasificación LoC:
  • KF4575 .W65 1986
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Imagen de cubierta Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Biblioteca de origen Colección Ubicación en estantería Signatura topográfica Materiales especificados Info Vol URL Copia número Estado Notas Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras Reserva de ítems Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar Reservas para cursos
Libro Biblioteca de Derecho Mons. Fremiot Torres Oliver Colección General biblioteca derecho KF 4575 .W65 1986 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) Disponible 70000000389713
Libro Biblioteca de Derecho Mons. Fremiot Torres Oliver Colección General biblioteca derecho KF 4575 .W65 1986 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) Disponible 70000000028451
Total de reservas: 0

Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new 'rights with fateful political consequences.' Originally published by Basic Books.

Series statement from jacket.

Includes indexes.

Bibliography: p. 357-380.

Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics

CHOICE Review

Just when we thought that not another word could be written on the history of judicial review in the US, we are presented with a ``new history of judicial review from the Founding Fathers to the Burger Court,'' a study that ``carefully traces the origins, evolution, and transformation of this uniquely American institution.'' How this ``new'' text differs significantly from the scores of other texts and articles on the subject requires a fairly subtle mind. But since the book is new, the examples it provides are at least up to date, and the author's reinterpretation of the writings of the Founding Fathers and of 19th-century jurists might contain some novel insights. The book might have profited by a bibliography of the other works written in this area and from a more detailed subject index. The writing style is good. This work should be of interest to neophytes in the area of judicial review or to old hands who can abide yet one more reexamination of the subject. Upper-division and graduate readers.-R.A. Carp, University of Houston
Compartir
logopucpr-y-vive

Contáctanos

¡Queremos saber de ti!

Tel. 787.841.2000 Ext. 1801

bibliotecavaldes@pucpr.edu

⁣Búscanos en las redes

© 2026 Desarrollado por Ignite Online • All Rights Reserved • Powered by Koha.