Nostradamus. Sócrates Georges Dumézil ; traducción de Juan Almela.
Idioma: Español Lenguaje original: Francés Series Colección Popular ; 397Detalles de publicación: México Fondo de Cultura Económica 1989.Descripción: 179 p. 17 cmISBN:- 9681629736
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca Encarnación Valdés Colección General bev | 133.3 D888m E (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 80000000201189 |
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
En el primer ensayo, Dum zil comenta de Nostradamus, la vig sima cuarteta de la novena centuria en la que se anunciaba la huida y arresto de Luis XVI en Varennes. el segundo es un divertimento sobre las palabras que S crates pronunci antes de morir: "Debemos un gallo a Esculapio", enigm tica sentencia que el autor aborda con ingenio y claridad de discernimiento.
Translation of: Le moyne noir en gris dedans Varennes.
Includes bibliographical references.
Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics
Until his death, Georges Dumezil was the guiding light of the study of Indo-European civilizations. He taught at the College de France for many years, directed the Section des Sciences Religieuses of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes of the Sorbonne, and by the time he was elected to the Academie Francais in the fall of 1978, Dumezil had extended his influence worldwide.In essence, Dumezil's work effects a "paradigm shift" in the study of Indo-European mythology. Earlier scholars worked from a narrowly philological paradigm. Dumezil supplemented this approach with insights derived from functionalist sociology. His concern was not with isolated pieces but with systems. At its simplest, his basic idea is that Indo-European peoples share a "tripartite ideology"; they tend to think in specific groups of three.
Dumezil postulated that initially Indo-European society was arranged hierarchically into three distinct groups: priests, warriors, and herder-cultivators. Corresponding to each group was a specific function: sovereignty, physical (primarily military) prowess, and sustenance. Furthermore, each group was represented collectively by gods and goddesses who shared its function. The hierarchical division of society has been preserved only in India (the upper three varnas, or classes), but its effects are widespread in the mythologies and religions of Indo-European peoples, and occasionally, as at Rome, in their accounts of their histories as well.
Some scholars have always disputed Dumezil's theories. The most notable, recent critic has been British archaeological theorist Colin Renfrew. In the last few years, Dumezil, like many of his generation, has also been criticized for his politics.
(Bowker Author Biography)