Imagen de portada de Amazon
Imagen de Amazon.com
Imagen de cubierta Syndetics
Portada de Syndetics
Imagen de OpenLibrary

Nostradamus. Sócrates Georges Dumézil ; traducción de Juan Almela.

Por: Idioma: Español Lenguaje original: Francés Series Colección Popular ; 397Detalles de publicación: México Fondo de Cultura Económica 1989.Descripción: 179 p. 17 cmISBN:
  • 9681629736
Tema(s):
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Imagen de cubierta Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Biblioteca de origen Colección Ubicación en estantería Signatura topográfica Materiales especificados Info Vol URL Copia número Estado Notas Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras Reserva de ítems Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar Reservas para cursos
Libro Biblioteca Encarnación Valdés Colección General bev 133.3 D888m E (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) Disponible 80000000201189
Total de reservas: 0

Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

En el primer ensayo, Dum zil comenta de Nostradamus, la vig sima cuarteta de la novena centuria en la que se anunciaba la huida y arresto de Luis XVI en Varennes. el segundo es un divertimento sobre las palabras que S crates pronunci antes de morir: "Debemos un gallo a Esculapio", enigm tica sentencia que el autor aborda con ingenio y claridad de discernimiento.

Translation of: Le moyne noir en gris dedans Varennes.

Includes bibliographical references.

Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics

Until his death, Georges Dumezil was the guiding light of the study of Indo-European civilizations. He taught at the College de France for many years, directed the Section des Sciences Religieuses of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes of the Sorbonne, and by the time he was elected to the Academie Francais in the fall of 1978, Dumezil had extended his influence worldwide.

In essence, Dumezil's work effects a "paradigm shift" in the study of Indo-European mythology. Earlier scholars worked from a narrowly philological paradigm. Dumezil supplemented this approach with insights derived from functionalist sociology. His concern was not with isolated pieces but with systems. At its simplest, his basic idea is that Indo-European peoples share a "tripartite ideology"; they tend to think in specific groups of three.

Dumezil postulated that initially Indo-European society was arranged hierarchically into three distinct groups: priests, warriors, and herder-cultivators. Corresponding to each group was a specific function: sovereignty, physical (primarily military) prowess, and sustenance. Furthermore, each group was represented collectively by gods and goddesses who shared its function. The hierarchical division of society has been preserved only in India (the upper three varnas, or classes), but its effects are widespread in the mythologies and religions of Indo-European peoples, and occasionally, as at Rome, in their accounts of their histories as well.

Some scholars have always disputed Dumezil's theories. The most notable, recent critic has been British archaeological theorist Colin Renfrew. In the last few years, Dumezil, like many of his generation, has also been criticized for his politics.

(Bowker Author Biography)

Compartir
logopucpr-y-vive

Contáctanos

¡Queremos saber de ti!

Tel. 787.841.2000 Ext. 1801

bibliotecavaldes@pucpr.edu

⁣Búscanos en las redes

© 2026 Desarrollado por Ignite Online • All Rights Reserved • Powered by Koha.