Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

The Internet has been romanticized as a zone of freedom. The alluring combination of sophisticated technology with low barriers to entry and instantaneous outreach to millions of users has mesmerized libertarians and communitarians alike. Lawmakers have joined the celebration, passing the Communications Decency Act, which enables Internet Service Providers to allow unregulated discourse without danger of liability, all in the name of enhancing freedom of speech. But an unregulated Internet is a breeding ground for offensive conduct.

At last we have a book that begins to focus on abuses made possible by anonymity, freedom from liability, and lack of oversight. The distinguished scholars assembled in this volume, drawn from law and philosophy, connect the absence of legal oversight with harassment and discrimination. Questioning the simplistic notion that abusive speech and mobocracy are the inevitable outcomes of new technology, they argue that current misuse is the outgrowth of social, technological, and legal choices. Seeing this clearly will help us to be better informed about our options.

In a field still dominated by a frontier perspective, this book has the potential to be a real game changer. Armed with example after example of harassment in Internet chat rooms and forums, the authors detail some of the vile and hateful speech that the current combination of law and technology has bred. The facts are then treated to analysis and policy prescriptions. Read this book and you will never again see the Internet through rose-colored glasses.

Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics

• Introduction(p. 1)
• I The Internet and Its Problems
• 1 Speech, Privacy, and Reputation on the Internet(p. 15)
• 2 Civil Rights in Our Information Age(p. 31)
• 3 The Internet's Anonymity Problem(p. 50)
• 4 Objectification and Internet Misogyny(p. 68)
• II Reputation
• 5 Believing False Rumors(p. 91)
• 6 Reputation Regulation: Disclosure and the Challenge of Clandestinely Commensurating Computing(p. 107)
• 7 Youthful Indiscretion in an Internet Age(p. 124)
• 8 Academic Administrators and the Challenge of Social-Networking Websites(p. 140)
• III Speech
• 9 Cleaning Cyber-Cesspools: Google and Free Speech(p. 155)
• 10 Privacy, the First Amendment, and the Internet(p. 174)
• 11 Foul Language: Some Ruminations on Cohen V. California(p. 195)
• IV Privacy
• 12 Collective Privacy(p. 217)
• 13 Privacy on Social Networks: Norms, Markets, and Natural Monopoly(p. 237)
• Notes(p. 259)
• Contributors(p. 287)
• Index(p. 291)

Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics

Library Journal Review

Much writing about the Internet focuses on its remarkable capacity to democratize access to information, to provide a platform for previously marginalized voices, and to otherwise lower barriers and promote freedom. Levmore (William B. Graham Professor of Law, Univ. of Chicago Law Sch.) and Nussbaum (Ernst Freund Distinguished Service Professor of Law & Ethics, Univ. of Chicago) explore the dark side of all this unregulated freedom and expose the truly vile and harmful speech that can flourish online. The roster of contributors, including many major thinkers on Internet policy and culture, is impressive. The book takes up the serious questions we must face as the net becomes not some specialized tool for technology enthusiasts but ubiquitous. What policies can we put in place to curb bullying and harassment while protecting free speech? What provisions can be made to protect individuals' privacy or to prevent false and malicious rumors from forever tarnishing reputations? This book is an essential read for anyone interested in exploring these questions. It is particularly powerful in its treatment of privacy, reputation, and speech (both the protection of speech and the regulation of it) as inextricably linked concepts. VERDICT Indispensable! Scholars of Internet law and general readers alike will find this book informative, illuminating, and disturbing. [See also Evgeny Morozov's The Net Delusion, reviewed on page opposite.-Ed.]-Rachel Bridgewater, Reed Coll. Lib., Portland, OR (c) Copyright 2010. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

Publishers Weekly Review

This collection of Academic essays poses a provocative thesis: though the freedoms bestowed by the Internet are universally recognized and generally lauded, a lack of regulation has allowed for radicalism, and nothing short of a Kafkaesque solution would be able to establish control now. Essays address the rapid evolution of the internet, raising issues of privacy, free speech, reputation, identity, and `digital baggage.' In her contribution, Nussbaum reveals the darker side of the web: misogynistic objectification and harassment of female users. And Levmore equates the internet to a "high school's bathroom stalls," providing frightening case studies of cyber mobs abusing freedom and evading reproach through anonymity to support his analogy. A fascinating foray into social networks by Karen Bradshaw and Souvik Saha uncovers the extent of behavior modification and the reach of employers and colleges into private information. And Anupam Chander astutely reveals how youthful indiscretions in the internet age can lead to "reputational bankruptcy." This collection exposes the "double-edged sword" of the World Wide Web, poses pertinent questions about the legal quandaries overshadowing free speech, and even offers some pragmatic solutions. (Jan.) © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.

CHOICE Review

Horror stories abound about such Internet misbehavior as cyberbullying, cyberstalking, sexting, hate speech, threats, libel, ridicule, revelations of embarrassing private information, harassment, defamation, fraud, and copyright violations. Noted University of Chicago law school professors Levmore and Nussbaum collected 13 stimulating and highly readable essays by leading legal scholars and social observers that describe the cultural roots of cyberspace misconduct and suggest possible solutions. The contributors present varied perspectives about the proper balance between free speech and protection of the vulnerable. These authors generally value vigorous social and political discussions in cyberspace. However, they worry that freeing online posters from legal penalties for deleterious statements and from the social norms that restrain individuals from injurious speech in the bricks and mortar world results in excessive amounts of harmful, low-value communication. They propose numerous creative approaches to encourage civility, ranging from new torts to compensate victims to structural changes, such as revised search algorithms to guide users away from cyber-cesspools. The most common recommendations are to amend the US Communications Decency Act, which immunizes Web site operators from liability for third-party postings, and to limit the Internet's anonymity. Summing Up: Recommended. All levels/libraries. T. H. Koenig Northeastern University