Foreign plaintiffs in products liability actions the defense of forum non conveniens Warren Freedman.
Detalles de publicación: New York Quorum Books 1988.Descripción: vii, 162 p. 25 cmISBN:- 0899301894 (lib. bdg. : alk. paper)
- 346.03/82 342.6382 19
- K953 .F737 1988
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca Encarnación Valdés Colección General bev | 346.0382 F853f (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 80000000488463 |
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
This book is directed at practical applications and case law support for invoking forum non conveniens. It begins with a basic discussion of the evolution of the doctrine. The balance of the book is devoted to applying appropriate case law to a variety of situations. Likely opposing arguments, public policy notions, and the relationship of forum non conveniens to jurisdiction and venue are also considered. Virginia Journal of International Law
American multinational corporations face a unique problem with regard to products liability litigation instituted by foreign plaintiffs. In many cases, plaintiffs outside the U.S. file suits in U.S. courts despite the fact that the incident on which the suit is based took place in other countries. Such action is often taken because of features peculiar to the U.S. legal system, including the doctrine of strict liability, the availability of contingency fees for attorneys, and the prevalence of large awards to individuals in products liability cases. This informative study by a legal professional and products liability specialist focuses on a doctrine that can lessen liability exposure for multinational corporations. By successfully petitioning the courts under the doctrine of forum non conveniens, corporations may have court proceedings transferred to another jurisdiction, often outside the U.S., which has a direct connection with the incident and where potential liability exposure is greatly reduced. Following an introductory discussion of the evolution of this doctrine, Freedman documents its use with appropriate case law in a wide variety of situations.
Includes indexes.
Bibliography: p. [151]-152.
Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics
- The Historical Development of the Common Law Doctrine
- ""Forum-Shopping"" or Plaintiff's Choice of Forum
- Jurisdiction, Venue, and Forum
- Non Conveniens Cases Supportive of Forum
- Non Conveniens Dismissal Cases Against Forum
- Non Conveniens Dismissal Analysis of Factors
- Favoring and Not Favoring Application of Forum
- Non Conveniens Choice of Law and Conflicts of Law Governmental
- Immunities and Forum
- Non Conveniens Foreign Plaintiffs Against Foreign
- Defendants in U.S. Courts
- The Bhopal, India Catastrophe: The Defens