The right to speak ill defamation, reputation and free speech Russell L. Weaver ... [et al.].
Detalles de publicación: Durham, N.C. Carolina Academic Press c2006.Descripción: xvi, 331 p. 24 cmISBN:- 0890894892 (alk. paper)
- 9780890894897 (alk. paper)
- 342.08/53 22
- K 5210 .R54 2006
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca de Derecho Mons. Fremiot Torres Oliver Colección General biblioteca derecho | K 5210 .R54 2006 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 70000000832845 |
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
Based on empirical research involving interviews with defamation lawyers, as well as journalists, editors, and producers, this book provides a comparative examination of defamation liability standards and their impact on the media's ability to report on matters of public examination. The interviews span a twelve-year time frame during which there were significant developments in the affected countries (Australia, the United States and Great Britain) including extensions of qualified privilege in the Reynolds (Great Britain) and Lange (Australia) decisions.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 293-304) and index.
The common law tradition -- U.S. defamation law and the New York Times decision -- 1990s Australian and English developments -- Interview results : England and Australia prior to qualified privilege extensions -- The American interviews : the impact of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and the "actual malice standard" -- Interview results : Australia following extensions to qualified privilege -- Interview results : Reynold's impact on the English media -- Conclusions : defamation, free speech and reputation in democratic societies.