Imagen de portada de Amazon
Imagen de Amazon.com
Imagen de cubierta Syndetics
Portada de Syndetics
Imagen de OpenLibrary

A Court divided the Rehnquist court and the future of constitutional law Mark Tushnet.

Por: Detalles de publicación: New York W.W. Norton and Co. c2006.Edición: 1st edDescripción: 398 p. 21 cmISBN:
  • 0393327574 (pbk.)
  • 9780393327571 (pbk.)
Tema(s):
Contenidos:
William Rehnquist's court -- Two kinds of Republicans -- Clarence Thomas's constitution -- Ruth Bader Ginsburg's equal protection clause -- Antonin Scalia's First Amendment -- Anthony Kennedy and gay rights -- The religious right's agenda : symbols and money -- Holding the line on abortion -- Race, affirmative action, and crime -- The federalism revolution -- The takings project -- Big business's constitution -- A Supreme Court united?
Valoración
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Imagen de cubierta Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Biblioteca de origen Colección Ubicación en estantería Signatura topográfica Materiales especificados Info Vol URL Copia número Estado Notas Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras Reserva de ítems Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar Reservas para cursos
Libro Biblioteca de Derecho Mons. Fremiot Torres Oliver Colección General biblioteca derecho KF 8742 .T87 2006 (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) Disponible 70000000832720
Total de reservas: 0

Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

"An incisive consideration of the Supremes, offering erudite yet accessible clues to legal thinking on the most important level."-- Kirkus Reviews

In this authoritative reckoning with the eighteen-year record of the Rehnquist Court, Georgetown law professor Mark Tushnet reveals how the decisions of nine deeply divided justices have left the future of the Court; and the nation; hanging in the balance. Many have assumed that the chasm on the Court has been between its liberals and its conservatives. In reality, the division was between those in tune with the modern post-Reagan Republican Party and those who, though considered to be in the Court's center, represent an older Republican tradition. As a result, the Court has modestly promoted the agenda of today's economic conservatives, but has regularly defeated the agenda of social issues conservatives; while paving the way for more radically conservative path in the future.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

William Rehnquist's court -- Two kinds of Republicans -- Clarence Thomas's constitution -- Ruth Bader Ginsburg's equal protection clause -- Antonin Scalia's First Amendment -- Anthony Kennedy and gay rights -- The religious right's agenda : symbols and money -- Holding the line on abortion -- Race, affirmative action, and crime -- The federalism revolution -- The takings project -- Big business's constitution -- A Supreme Court united?

Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics

  • Introduction(p. 9)
  • 1 William Rehnquist's Court(p. 13)
  • 2 Two Kinds of Republican(p. 49)
  • 3 Clarence Thomas's Constitution(p. 71)
  • 4 Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Equal Protection Clause(p. 104)
  • 5 Antonin Scalia's First Amendment(p. 130)
  • 6 Anthony Kennedy and Gay Rights(p. 156)
  • 7 The Religious Right's Agenda-Symbols and Money(p. 180)
  • 8 Holding the Line on Abortion(p. 204)
  • 9 Race, Affirmative Action, and Crime(p. 223)
  • 10 The Federalism Revolution(p. 249)
  • 11 The Takings Project(p. 279)
  • 12 Big Business's Constitution(p. 302)
  • 13 A Supreme Court United?(p. 319)
  • Epilogue: The End of the Rehnquist Court(p. 347)
  • Notes(p. 361)
  • Index(p. 383)

Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics

Mark Tushnet is Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Law Center
Compartir
logopucpr-y-vive

Contáctanos

¡Queremos saber de ti!

Tel. 787.841.2000 Ext. 1801

bibliotecavaldes@pucpr.edu

⁣Búscanos en las redes

© 2026 Desarrollado por Ignite Online • All Rights Reserved • Powered by Koha.