Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

If you want to teach administrative law through the case method and focus on the principles underlying core doctrines, you will find everything you need in this casebook. Administrative Law is a streamlined 'workhorse,' a case-rich book that covers the core issues in just 816 pages. The authors guide students to understanding through: lightly edited cases that preserve the feel of reading an entire opinion, including facts, content, full analysis, and citations introductory material and questions to focus students' reading of the cases and stimulate class discussion notes to enrich understanding of the relevant legal doctrines the book is divided into four self-contained parts, which can be taught in any order: Adjudication Rulemaking Role of Agencies in Three-Branch Government Judicial Review A comprehensive Teacher's Manual provides: responses to all the questions in the text case summaries and discussion suggestions based on authors' in-class use of the text sample syllabi This current and concise new teaching tool helps instructors take maximum advantage of the case method, concentrating on key doctrinal points. Be sure to examine Administrative Law before you choose materials for your next course.

Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics

• Preface(p. xvii)
• Chapter 1 Introduction(p. 1)
• A. Overview of the Work and Place of Administrative Agencies in Our System of Government(p. 1)
• B. Adjudication and Rulemaking(p. 15)
• Londoner v. City and County of Denver(p. 15)
• Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization(p. 20)
• Chapter 2 Adjudication(p. 23)
• A. Constitutional Right to a Hearing(p. 23)
• Brief Introduction to Procedural Due Process(p. 23)
• Bailey v. Richardson(p. 25)
• Goldberg v. Kelly(p. 36)
• Board of Regents v. Roth(p. 45)
• Perry v. Sindermann(p. 53)
• Paul v. Davis(p. 58)
• B. How Much Process Is Due?(p. 66)
• Mathews v. Eldridge(p. 66)
• Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill(p. 76)
• Goss v. Lopez(p. 85)
• Ingraham v. Wright(p. 92)
• Note on Summary Deprivations of Property(p. 100)
• C. Statutory Hearing Rights: Triggering APA Requirements(p. 102)
• Note on the Federal APA(p. 103)
• Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v. Costle(p. 107)
• Note on When Agencies Must Observe Formal Adjudication Procedures(p. 114)
• D. Parties and Intervention(p. 117)
• E. Evidence and Proof Issues(p. 119)
• Richardson v. Perales(p. 119)
• Steadman v. Securities and Exchange Commission(p. 128)
• F. Combination of Functions(p. 133)
• Withrow v. Larkin(p. 133)
• Note on "Total Quality Assurance" ("TQA") and the Administrative Law Judge(p. 142)
• Nash v. Bowen(p. 144)
• G. Bias(p. 147)
• Antoniu v. SEC(p. 147)
• H. Ex Parte Contacts(p. 152)
• First Savings & Loan Assn. v. Vandygriff(p. 152)
• Vandygriff v. First Savings & Loan Assn.(p. 154)
• I. Estoppel Against the Government(p. 157)
• Schweiker v. Hansen(p. 157)
• J. Document Disclosure and Open Meetings(p. 162)
• Note on the Freedom of Information Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act(p. 162)
• Chapter 3 Rulemaking(p. 165)
• A. Introduction to Rulemaking(p. 165)
• National Petroleum Refiners Ass'n v. FTC(p. 165)
• Note on APA Requirements for Rulemaking(p. 174)
• Bowen v. Georgetown Univ. Hospital(p. 175)
• B. Notice and Comment: "Informal" Rulemaking(p. 182)
• Chocolate Manufacturers Assn. v. Block(p. 182)
• United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp.(p. 190)
• Note on the Concise Explanatory Statement Requirement(p. 199)
• Note on Bias in Rulemaking(p. 201)
• C. Exceptions to Informal Rulemaking Requirements(p. 202)
• Mada-Luna v. Fitzpatrick(p. 202)
• Warder v. Shalala(p. 210)
• Note on Other APA Exceptions from the Requirements for Notice-and-Comment Rulemaking(p. 221)
• D. Beyond Notice and Comment: "Formal," "Hybrid," and Negotiated Rulemaking(p. 225)
• United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.(p. 226)
• Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC(p. 235)
• Note on Hybrid Rulemaking(p. 245)
• Note on Additional Generic Requirements for Rulemaking(p. 246)
• Note on Alternative Dispute Resolution and Federal Administrative Agencies(p. 249)
• E. Must an Agency Promulgate Rules?(p. 252)
• SEC v. Chenery Corp. (Chenery II)(p. 252)
• Note on NLRB v. Wyman-Gordon(p. 263)
• NLRB v. Bell Aerospace Co.(p. 263)
• F. Avoiding Adjudication Through Rulemaking(p. 270)
• Heckler v. Campbell(p. 270)
• G. Must an Agency Adhere to Its Rules?(p. 276)
• Sameena, Inc. v. U.S. Air Force(p. 276)
• Chapter 4 Role of Agencies in Three-Branch Government(p. 283)
• A. Historical Introduction(p. 283)
• B. Conforming Agency Practice to Article III(p. 288)
• Crowell v. Benson(p. 288)
• Northern Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.(p. 294)
• CFTC v. Schor(p. 298)
• Note on the Seventh Amendment(p. 308)
• C. The Nondelegation Doctrine(p. 312)
• A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States(p. 312)
• Industrial Union Dept. v. American Petroleum Inst.(p. 322)
• Note on Mistretta v. United States(p. 338)
• Whitman v. American Trucking Ass'ns(p. 339)
• D. The Legislative Veto(p. 346)
• Ins v. Chadha(p. 346)
• Note on Statutorily Mandated Congressional Review(p. 373)
• E. Executive Power to Appoint(p. 376)
• Buckley v. Valeo(p. 376)
• Note on Freytag v. Commissioner(p. 386)
• Note on Landry v. FDIC(p. 387)
• F. Executive Power to Remove(p. 389)
• Myers v. United States(p. 389)
• Humphrey's Executor v. United States(p. 396)
• Note on Bowsher v. Synar(p. 401)
• Morrison v. Olson(p. 403)
• G. Presidential Review of Agency Rulemaking(p. 425)
• Note on Presidential Review of Agency Rulemaking(p. 425)
• Executive Order 12866(p. 428)
• Chapter 5 Judicial Review(p. 437)
• A. Scope of Review of Fact(p. 437)
• NLRB v. Universal Camera Corp.(p. 437)
• Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB(p. 442)
• B. Scope of Review of Law(p. 452)
• Cabinet for Human Resources v. Jewish Hospital Healthcare Svcs.(p. 452)
• Skidmore v. Swift & Co.(p. 454)
• Chevron U.S.A. v. NRDC(p. 457)
• MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. AT&T Co.(p. 465)
• Holly Farms Corp. v. NLRB(p. 470)
• United States v. Mead Corp.(p. 481)
• Note on Barnhart v. Walton(p. 499)
• Note on Agency Non-Acquiescence in Court of Appeals Decisions(p. 500)
• C. Distinguishing Issues of Fact and Law(p. 502)
• Campbell v. Merit Systems Protection Board(p. 502)
• D. Scope of Review of Exercises of Discretion(p. 513)
• Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe(p. 513)
• Note on Judicial Supplementation of the Agency Record(p. 519)
• Note on the Arbitrary or Capricious Standard and "Hard Look" Review(p. 520)
• Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.(p. 522)
• Note on the Relationship Between Arbitrary or Capricious Review and Chevron Step II Analysis(p. 534)
• AFL-CIO v. Marshall(p. 535)
• E. Distinguishing Among Issues of Fact, Law and Discretion(p. 538)
• Allentown Mack Sales & Service v. NLRB(p. 538)
• F. Cause of Action, Jurisdiction, Reviewability(p. 550)
• Note on Judicial Review as a Civil Action(p. 550)
• Note on Money Damage Suits(p. 553)
• Johnson v. Robison(p. 558)
• Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians(p. 561)
• Webster v. Doe(p. 566)
• Note on Heckler v. Chaney(p. 580)
• G. Standing(p. 583)
• 1. Injury in Fact(p. 583)
• Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife(p. 583)
• Federal Election Commission v. Akins(p. 597)
• Note on Standing in Qui Tam Actions(p. 604)
• Note on Redressability(p. 606)
• 2. Zone of Interests(p. 607)
• The Chicago Junction Case(p. 607)
• Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes(p. 609)
• FCC v. Sanders Bros. Radio Station(p. 613)
• ADPSO v. Camp ("Data Processing")(p. 617)
• Note on Agency Capture and the Availability of Judicial Review(p. 620)
• Air Courier Conference v. Postal Workers(p. 623)
• NCUA v. First Nat'l & Trust Co.(p. 629)
• 3. Review of Standing Law(p. 644)
• Bennett v. Spear(p. 644)
• H. Ripeness(p. 654)
• Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner(p. 654)
• Toilet Goods Ass'n v. Gardner(p. 660)
• I. Finality(p. 669)
• FTC v. Standard Oil Company of California(p. 669)
• Note on Bennett v. Spear(p. 675)
• Note on the Finality of Agency Inaction(p. 676)
• Note on Statutory Time Limits on Judicial Review of Agency Action(p. 679)
• J. Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies(p. 684)
• Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.(p. 684)
• McCarthy v. Madigan(p. 688)
• Darby v. Cisneros(p. 690)
• Note on Sims v. Apfel(p. 696)
• K. Primary Jurisdiction(p. 697)
• Nader v. Allegheny Airlines(p. 697)
• Appendix A The Administrative Procedure Act (Selected Provisions)(p. 705)
• Appendix B Uniform Law Commissioners' Model State Administrative Procedure Act (1981) (Selected Provisions)(p. 729)
• Table of Cases(p. 761)
• Index(p. 773)

Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics

John M. Rogers: Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Thomas P. Lewis Professor of Law Emeritus University of Kentucky College of Law
Michael P. Healy: Dorothy Salmon Professor of Law University of Kentucky College of Law
Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr.: Professor of Law and Ethan Allen Fellow Washington and Lee University School of Law