The curriculum experiment meeting the challenge of social change John Elliott.
Detalles de publicación: Buckingham [England] Bristol, PA, USA Open University Press 1998.Descripción: xiv, 202 p. 24 cmISBN:- 0335194303 (hc)
- 033519429X (pbk.)
- 375/.001 21
- LB2806.15 .E45 1998
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca Mons. Iñaki Mallona (Arecibo) Colección General ab | 375.001 E46c (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 60000003077929 |
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
This book focuses on the interface between curriculum policy practice and social change in technology-driven advanced societies, and the challenges this presents for education in the 21st century.
It begins with both an autobiographical account of the experience of curriculum change in England over the last 40 years and an analysis of a major issue which emerged during that period, namely, the teacher's role in curriculum development. It then moves on to look at what the author believes to be a current manifestation of contemporary curriculum policy and practice in England: student disaffection from schooling. It is argued that the now widespread phenomenon of disaffection can be explained by the failure of curriculum policy-making to respond to the complexity of social change in an advanced modern society.
Drawing on the experience of attempts at radical innovation in the curriculum within the UK and other countries, the author develops a framework for curriculum policy making and development which he argues will enable education to meet the challenges of social change. In the process he undertakes a critique of the currently fashionable school effectiveness and improvement movements and argues that they are underpinned by outmoded views of the roles and functions of schools.
Includes bibliographical references (p. [190]-194) and index.