Psychological classification of the adult male prison inmate Patricia Van Voorhis.
Series SUNY series in new directions in criminal justice studiesDetalles de publicación: Albany, NY State University of New York Press c1994.Descripción: xvi, 364 p. ill. 24 cmISBN:- 079141793X (hard : acid-free paper)
- 0791417948 (pbk. : acid-free paper)
- 365/.6 20
- HV8763 .V35 1994
| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca Encarnación Valdés Colección General bev | 365.6 V217p (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 80000001801417 |
Total de reservas: 0
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
This book describes and examines five psychological systems for classifying adult male prison inmates: 1) Warren's I-level; 2) Megargee's MMPI-Based Criminal Classification System; 3) Hunt's Conceptual Level; 4) Quay's Adult Internal Management System; and 5) the Jesness Inventory Classification System. It also presents psychometric data on the reliability and validity of each system and illustrates different adjustment patterns of prison inmates.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 343-352) and index.
Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- Research Questions
- Implications
- Research Setting and Design Overview
- Description of the Five Classification Systems
- Administrative Context of Internal Classification
- Organization of the book
- 2 Descriptions of the Five Classification Systems
- Empirical Typologies
- Megargee's MMPI-Based Typology
- Quay's Adult Internal Management System (AIMS)
- Theoretical Typologies
- Interpersonal Maturity Level
- Jesness Inventory I-level System
- Conceptual Level
- Discussion
- 3 Previous Research
- Methodology of Classification and Prediction
- Psychological Classification in Corrections
- Reliability
- Construct Validity
- Predictive Validity and Institutional Adjustment
- Discussion
- 4 Methodology
- Sample Selection
- Data Collection Process
- Availability of Data
- Measure of Research Variables
- Social, Demographic, and Criminal History
- Interview Background (Content) Items
- Classification Variables
- Follow-up Variables
- Data Analysis Plan
- 5 Description of the Samples
- Social and Democratic Background Characteristics
- Prior Record Background Characteristics
- Characteristics of the Conviction Offense
- Diagnostic and Classification Distributions
- Summary
- 6 Construct Validity
- Test Procedures
- Results of Bivariate Analyses
- Situational
- Immature Dependent
- Neurotic
- Manipulative
- Committed Criminal
- Cognitive Developmental
- Results of Factor Analyses
- Summary and Discussion
- 7 Prediction of Disciplinary-Related Prison Outcomes
- Summary of the Findings
- Penitentiary
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Officially Recorded Disciplinary Infractions
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Self-Reported Disciplinary Problems
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Staff Ratings of Disciplinary Problems
- Prison Camp
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Officially Recorded Disciplinary Infractions
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Self-Reported Disciplinary Problems
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Staff Ratings of Disciplinary Problems
- Discussion
- The Importance of Criterion Measures
- Specific Constructs
- 8 Psychological Correlates of Treatment-Related Outcomes
- Summary of Findings
- Penitentiary
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Interview-Based Measures of Inmates' Needs
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Interview-Based Measures of Inmates' Attitudes toward Treatment and Incarceration
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Self-Report Indices of Stress and Interaction Patterns
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Staff Ratings
- Prison Camp
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Interview-Based Measures of Inmates' Needs
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Interview-Based Measures of Inmates' toward Treatment and Incarceration
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Self-Report Indices of Stress and Interaction Patterns
- The Effects of the Classification Types on Staff Ratings
- Discussion
- 9 Summary and Discussion of Research Goals
- Limitations of the Study
- Reliability
- Independence of Some Measures
- Data Collection Difficulties for Staff Assessment Measures
- Limited Number of Subjects
- Research Issues
- What does the comparison among systems show us about the number of types that are needed to classify these populations in an optimal manner according to psychological criteria?
- What types of test assessment procedures are most efficient and most useful in these settings?
- Are there important differences between institutional settings that must be considered in using psychological classification systems?
- Classification Profiles
- Quay Adult Internal Management System (AIMS)
- Megargee MMPI-Based Typology
- Conceptual Level
- Jesness Inventory (I-level)
- I-level (Interview Method)
- 10 Policy and Research Implications
- Treatment and Management Implications
- Directors for Future Research
- Implications for Correctional Research
- Appendices
- Appendix A Background Data Collection Form (PSR)
- Appendix B I-level Interview
- Appendix C Follow-up Survey
- Appendix D Items Composing Penitentiary Follow-up Scales
- Appendix E Items Composing Prison Camp Follow-up Scales
- Notes
- References
- Index
Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics
Patricia VanVoorhis is Associate Professor of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati.