| Imagen de cubierta | Tipo de ítem | Biblioteca actual | Biblioteca de origen | Colección | Ubicación en estantería | Signatura topográfica | Materiales especificados | Info Vol | URL | Copia número | Estado | Notas | Fecha de vencimiento | Código de barras | Reserva de ítems | Prioridad de la cola de reserva de ejemplar | Reservas para cursos | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Libro | Biblioteca Encarnación Valdés Colección General bev | 190 O97m (Navegar estantería(Abre debajo)) | Disponible | 80000001747537 |
Total de reservas: 0
Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:
Maturity and Modernity is the first book to analyze Nietzsche, Weber and Foucault as a tradition of theorising and to chart the development of genealogy as a mode of critique. It provides clear accounts of the main ideas of Nietzsche, Weber and Foucault (as well as a useful Glossary) and illustrates the relations between these thinkers at methodological, substantive and politcal levels.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 239-247) and indexes.
Tabla de contenidos provista por Syndetics
- Introduction
- Kant and the question of maturity
- Nietzsche the transformation of critique
- Nietzsche and genealogy
- The genealogy of modernity: Nietszche, asceticism and nihilism
- The politics of the Ubermensch: Nietzsche, maturity and modernity Weber genealogy as cultural science: Weber, methodology and critique
- The genealogy of modernity: Weber, asceticism and disenchantment The politics of "personality"
- Weber, maturity and modernity Foucault genealogy as historical ontology: Foucault, methodology and critique
- The genealogy of modernity: Foucault, humanism and biopolitics
- The politics of critique: Foucault, maturity and modernity
- Conclusion
Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics
CHOICE Review
Owen's book is a welcome addition to the debate concerning the status of reason in Continental thought. Owen places this debate in the context of the theme of maturity, by which is meant the autonomy of a self-determining reason. Owen argues that Kant's critical project results in an unsolved antinomy (at least unsolved by Kant) wherein reason is necessarily autonomous and ahistorical as well as historical because of its finitude. As a consequence of this problem, Owen claims that post-Kantian thought is confronted with the task of accounting for the historical specificity of reason itself; and this is precisely the task he sees Nietzsche, Weber, and Foucault working on. The exegesis of these three thinkers is, in general, fairly clear and should be accessible to readers with at least some familiarity with the concerns of modern philosophy. Recommended to undergraduate and graduate students as supplemental reading. J. A. Bell; Southeastern Louisiana UniversityNotas de autor provistas por Syndetics
David Owen is on the staffs of both The New Yorker and Golf Digest. A frequent contributor to The Atlantic Monthly, and the author of nine previous books, he lives in Washington, Connecticut.(Bowker Author Biography)