Descripciones mejoradas de Syndetics:

Deregulation was a political buzzword of the early 1980's. The Reagan Administration came to power on a platform dedicated to getting government "off the backs of the people." Deregulation promised to lower inflation, raise productivity, and reverse the sagging fortunes of American industry. And proponents declared deregulation morally right because it constituted a rollback of the arbitrary power of the state in favor of individual initiative and liberty. But the actual politics of deregulation, including the momentous breakup of ATandT, had already turned out to be far more complex than this rhetoric suggested. In The Irony of Regulatory Reform Horwitz examines the history of telecommunications--both telephone and broadcast--to build a compelling new theory of regulation. Against the backdrop of modern theories of the state, he presents a sweeping survey of the history of regulation in America, delineating three distinct periods of regulatory genesis and, correspondingly, three discrete types of agencies. Horwitz shows the underlying irony that while anti-regulation rhetoric was aimed at the so-called "social" regulatory agencies, in practice it has been the "economic" agencies that have been deregulated, often with vehement opposition from the industries affected. Within the context of this broader theory, telecommunications is a fascinating industry to study, because it determines the character of our marketplace of ideas, because it has been an arena of great technological transformation, and because of its fundamental role in anchoring the so-called "information age." Horwitz unveils the complex mosaic of forces--economic, political, legal, and technological--that undermined the traditional regulation of telecommunications and precipitated deregulation.

Reseñas proporcionadas por Syndetics

CHOICE Review

Horwitz (communications, University of California, San Diego) writes of the restructuring of the telecommunications industry, primarily the breakup of AT&T on January 1, 1984, but including changes in both broadcasting and telephone. Included are mentions of other industries also deregulated in the past decade: air travel, trucking, intercity busing, rail. The approach is primarily discursive history. "Theories of Regulation" (listed as public interest, regulatory failure, conspiracy, capture, organizational, and capitalist-state) and a single historical (stages)-political theory provide a backdrop for extensive discussions of the history and deregulation of the telecommunications and broadcasting industries. The unfortunate, ironic flaw in this volume is the absence of economic analysis. Without an understanding of the economics of markets, monopoly, and regulation, the discussion of both the grand scheme and its individual parts is inadequate. A prime example is the cross-subsidy, inefficiency argument (economics) behind the filing in 1974 of the antitrust case against AT&T; without the economics, none of the actors has a motive. For a superior history of the telephone industry, including the breakup, see Peter Temin, The Fall of the Bell System (CH, Apr '88). -R. A. Miller, Wesleyan University

Notas de autor provistas por Syndetics

Robert Britt Horwitz is at University of California, San Diego.